Abstract
Abstract
Background
Comprehensive commercial surrogacy became legal in India in 2002, and many foreigners, including individuals and same-sex couples, sought Indian surrogacy services due to their affordability. Numerous scandals resulted, with increasing calls for the government to eliminate the exploitation of women in lower social strata. In 2015, the Indian government decided to exclude foreign clients and commercial surrogacy remained legal for local Indian couples only. Furthermore, to eliminate exploitation, the concept of altruistic surrogacy was introduced in 2016. In 2020, some restrictions within altruistic surrogacy practice were removed. Controversy remains, however, in various sectors, not least because surrogacy is a relatively new concept in India. In this paper, the advantages and disadvantages of both altruistic and commercial surrogacy in the Indian context are considered, and more appropriate policy concerning surrogacy practices is suggested.
Methods
This paper is based on fieldwork conducted in India from 2010 to 2018. Interview surveys were conducted among doctors, policy makers, activists, former surrogates, and brokers. Government documents and media reports were also important sources.
Results
Surrogacy for commercial purposes began in India in 2002, and stakeholders within the commercial surrogacy industry became well established. It was found that such stakeholders were strongly opposed to altruistic surrogacy as introduced in 2016. It was also found that women in lower social strata still sought some form of financial compensation from their reproductive labor. Controversies surrounding altruistic surrogacy continue within Indian society.
Conclusion
Policies and practices aimed at eliminating exploitive need to consider the Indian context carefully. Any surrogacy practice might potentially be exploitive, and the distinction between commercial and altruistic surrogacy is too simplistic to be useful, with more nuanced understanding required. It is of critical importance that investigation continues on how to eliminate the exploitation of Indian surrogate mothers throughout the process, regardless of monetary compensation. The entire surrogacy process should be managed with sensitivity, particularly in relation to the well-being of the mother and child.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
History and Philosophy of Science,Health Policy,General Medicine,Issues, ethics and legal aspects
Reference45 articles.
1. In India, approximately 79.8 % of the population practice Hinduism, according to the national census in 2011. Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan. Republic of India basic date. https://www.mofa.go.jp/mofaj//area/india/data.html. Accessed 20 Apr 2023.
2. Sharma RS, Saxena R, Singh R. Infertility & assisted reproduction: A historical & modern scientific perspective. Indian J Med Res. 2018;148(Supplement):S10–4. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijmr.IJMR_636_18.
3. Shetty P. India’s unregulated surrogacy industry. The Lancet. 2012;380(9854):1633–4.
4. Indian Council of Medical Research, National Academy of Medical Sciences (India). National guidelines for accreditation, supervision, and regulation of ART clinics in India. 2005. https://main.icmr.nic.in/sites/default/files/art/ART_Pdf.pdf. Accessed 20 Apr 2023.
5. Ministry of Health & Family Welfare GOVT. of India, New Delhi, Indian Council of Medical Research New Delhi. Assisted Reproductive Technology (Regulation) Bill, 2010. https://main.icmr.nic.in/sites/default/files/guidelines/ART%20REGULATION%20Draft%20Bill1.pdf. Accessed 20 Apr 2023.
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献