The genetic differences between types 1 and 2 in von Hippel-Lindau syndrome: comprehensive meta-analysis

Abstract

Abstract Background Patients with von Hippel-Lindau (VHL) disease are at risk of developing tumors in the eye, brain, kidney, adrenal gland, and other organs based on their gene mutations. The VHL tumor suppressor gene contains pathogenic variants responsible for these events. This meta-analysis aims to investigate the genetic differences among the various types of VHL syndrome and their correlation with the location of mutations (exons and domains) in the VHL gene. Method Papers eligible for publication until September 2023 were identified using the electronic databases of PubMed, Google Scholar, Scopus, and EMBASE. The Random Effect model was utilized to evaluate the genetic differences between type 1 and type 2 VHL syndromes. Results The prevalence of missense mutations (MSs) was found to be 58.9% in type 1, while it was 88.1% in type 2. Interestingly, the probability of observing MSs in type 1 was 0.42 times lower compared to type 2. The mutation hotspots of the VHL gene were R167Q/W, Y98H, R238W, and S65L, respectively. Although type 2 had a high presentation of Y98H and R238W, it did not have a higher S65L than type 1. The analysis demonstrated a statistically significant higher prevalence of truncated mutations (PTMs) in type 1. Among type 1, large/complete deletions (L/C DELs) were found in 16.9% of cases, whereas in type 2 only 3.7%. This difference was statistically significant with a p-value < 0.001. Overall, the probability of identifying mutations in domain 2 compared to domain 1 was found to be 2.13 times higher in type 1 (p-value < 0.001). Furthermore, the probability of detecting exon 1 in comparison with observing exon 2 in type 1 was 2.11 times higher than type 2 and revealed a statistically significant result (p-value < 0.001). The detection of exon 2 was 2.18 times higher in type 1 (p-value < 0.001). In addition, the likelihood of discovering exon 2 compared with others was significantly lower in type 1 compared with type 2 VHL (OR = 0.63, p-value = 0.015). Conclusions We have revealed a comprehensive genetic difference between types 1 and 2 of VHL syndrome. The significant differences in MS, PTMs, L/C DELs, and the location of the mutations between type 1 and type 2 VHL patients in the Asian, European, and American populations emphasize the genetic heterogeneity of the syndrome. These findings may pave the way for the diagnosis, treatment, and further investigation of the mechanisms behind this complex genetic disorder.