Author:
Colombo-Barboza Guilherme Novoa,Rodrigues Pablo Felipe,Colombo-Barboza Fernanda Daroz Paulo,Moscovici Bernardo Kaplan,Colombo-Barboza Luiz Roberto,Colombo-Barboza Marcello Novoa,Nose Walton
Abstract
AbstractIn this review, we presented the principles of radial keratotomy (RK), its evolution, enhancement, and complications, and strategies to manage the consequences of RK in the present day. It is essential to understand the RK procedure f, the theoretical background that supported this surgery, the current effect on the cornea, and how to approach patients needing vision improvement. These patients are developing cataracts that need to be handled well, from the IOL calculation to the surgical procedure. Guided keratorefractive surgery is the most accurate procedure to improve these patient's vision and life. Nevertheless, some patients may need other approaches, such as sutures, penetrating keratoplasty, corneal rings, and pinhole implants, depending on the degree of irregularity of the cornea, ablation depth for guided surgery or if the sutures are open.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference72 articles.
1. Waring GO, Lynn MJ, Fielding B, et al. Rationale for and design of the national eye institute Prospective Evaluation of Radial Keratotomy (PERK) study. Ophthalmology. 1983;90:40–58.
2. Fc Donders. On the Anomalies of Accommodation and Refraction of the Eye. London: Hatton Press.
3. Snellen H. Die richtunge des hauptmeridiane des astigmatischen auges. Albrechh Graefes Arch Klin Ophthalmol. 1869;15:199–207.
4. Schiotz H. Ein Fall von hochgradigem Hornhautastigmatismus nach Starextraction Besserung auf operativem Wege. Arch Augenheilk. 1885;15:1.
5. Faber E. Operative behandeling von astigmatisme. Nederl Tijdschr v Geneesk. 1895;31:495–6.