Author:
Wang Xiang-ning,Zhou Jun,Cai Xuan,Li Tingting,Long Da,Wu Qiang
Abstract
Abstract
Background
To assess and characterize neovascularization of the optic disc (NVD) using optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) and different OCTA-based methods.
Methods
This retrospective, observational study included patients who were suspected of having early PDR with no presence of clinically apparent neovascularization (NV) bur were clinically diagnosed with proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR), or severe NPDR. Patients underwent standard clinical examinations and OCTA imaging using a 6 × 6 montage scan. Two trained graders identified NVD using different imaging systems (ultra-widefield-colour fundus photography (UWF-CFP), OCT, OCTA and fluorescein angiography (FA)). Moreover, morphological classification of NVD was performed. The detection and morphological classification of NVD by different OCTA-based methods (B-scan OCTA, En-face OCTA, VRI Angio and VRI Structure) were compared.
Results
A total of 169 eyes (126 eyes with PDR and 43 eyes with severe NPDR) of 123 participants were included in this study. The detection rate of NVD was 34.91% by UWF-CFP compared with 59.76% by OCT, 59.76% by OCTA, and 62.72% by FA. After excluding 2 cases with epiretinal membranes, the NVD diagnosis detected by OCT was used as the standard. Among 99 eyes diagnosed with NVD by OCT, B-scan OCTA detected NVD with a sensitivity of 97.98%, which was higher than that by en face OCTA (80.81%), VRI Angio (65.66%), and VRI Structure (61.62%) (all P < 0.05). According to its characteristics on OCTA, NVD was divided into four types (12 cases of type I, 6 cases of type II, 39 cases of type III, and 42 cases of type IV). For type I, B-scan OCTA exhibited a higher diagnostic sensitivity than other methods (P < 0.05). For types II and IV, there were no statistically significant differences in the sensitivity of various methods between the two groups (P > 0.05).
Conclusion
OCTA and different OCTA-based methods are significant to the diagnosis of NVD, and the diagnostic accuracy of different detection methods may be related to different types of NVD.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Ophthalmology,General Medicine
Reference29 articles.
1. Little HL, Zweng HC, Jack RL, Vassiliadis A. Techniques of argon laser photocoagulation of diabetic disk new vessels. Am J Ophthalmol. 1976;82(5):675–83.
2. Rand LI, Prud’homme GJ, Ederer F, Canner PL. Factors influencing the development of visual loss in advanced diabetic retinopathy. Diabetic Retinopathy Study (DRS) Report No. 10. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1985;26(7):983–91.
3. Manjunath V, Papastavrou V, Steel DH, Menon G, Taylor R, Peto T, Talks J. Wide-field imaging and OCT vs clinical evaluation of patients referred from diabetic retinopathy screening. Eye (Lond). 2015;29(3):416–23.
4. Schwartz R, Khalid H, Sivaprasad S, Nicholson L, Anikina E, Sullivan P, Patel PJ, Balaskas K, Keane PA. Objective Evaluation of Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy Using OCT. Ophthalmol Retina. 2020;4(2):164–74.
5. Oishi A, Hidaka J, Yoshimura N. Quantification of the image obtained with a wide-field scanning ophthalmoscope. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2014;55(4):2424–31.
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献