Author:
Ahmed Hassan M.,Salem Nancy M.,Al-Atabany Walid
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Corneal biomechanics is of great interest to researchers recently. Clinical findings relate them to corneal diseases and to outcomes of refractive surgery. To have a solid understanding of corneal diseases’ progression, it is important to understand corneal biomechanics. Also, they are essential for better explaining outcomes of refractive surgeries and their undesired consequences. There is a difficulty for studying corneal biomechanics in-vivo and multiple limitations arise for ex-vivo studies. Hence mathematical modelling is considered as a proper solution to overcome such obstacles. Mathematical modelling of cornea in-vivo allows studying corneal viscoelasticity with taking into consideration all boundary conditions existing in real in-vivo situation.
Methods
Three mathematical models are used to simulate corneal viscoelasticity and thermal behavior in two different loading situations: constant and transient loading. Two models of the three are used for viscoelasticity simulation which are Kelvin-Voigt and standard linear solid models. Also, temperature rise due to the ultrasound pressure push is calculated using bioheat transfer model for both the axial direction and as a 2D spatial map using the third model (standard linear solid model).
Results
Viscoelasticity simulation results show that standard linear solid model is efficient for describing the viscoelastic behavior of human cornea in both loading conditions. Results show also that the deformation amplitude obtained from standard linear solid model is more reasonable for corneal soft-tissue deformation with respect to corresponding clinical findings than that obtained from Kelvin-Voigt model. Thermal behavior results estimated corneal temperature rise to be roughly 0.2 °C, which conforms with FDA regulations for soft tissue safety.
Conclusion
Standard Linear Solid (SLS) model is better describing the human corneal behavior in response to constant and transient load more efficiently. Temperature rise (TR) for the corneal tissue of about 0.2 °C is conforming with FDA regulations and even less than the FDA regulations for soft tissue safety.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Ophthalmology,General Medicine
Reference32 articles.
1. Edmund C. Corneal topography and elasticity in normal and keratoconic eyes. A methodological study concerning the pathogenesis of keratoconus. ” Acta Ophthalmol Suppl (Oxf). 1989;193:1–36.
2. Edmund C. Corneal elasticity and ocular rigidity in normal and keratoconic eyes. Acta Ophthalmol. 1988;66(2):134–40.
3. Ahmed HM, Salem NM, Al-Atabany W. Impact of post–refractive surgeries on corneal Biomechanics—A review. J Clin Eng. 2021;46(4):177–88.
4. Tanter M, Touboul D, Gennisson J, Bercoff J, Fink M. “High-Resolution Quantitative Imaging of Cornea Elasticity Using Supersonic Shear Imaging,” IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging, vol. 28, no. 12, pp. 1881–1893, Dec. 2009, doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/TMI.2009.2021471.
5. Kobayashi AS, Staberg LG, Schlegel WA. Viscoelastic properties of human cornea. Exp Mech. 1973;13(12):497–503.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献