Author:
Liang Huijuan,Li Jiaqi,Zhang Nan,Wu Fang,Chen Xiaoshan,Luo Huanyuan,He Wenjun,Liu Siyuan,Kang Ting,Zhang Ruotong,Liu Yujie,Huang Zizhen,Zhang Lanping,Zhao Qing,Lv Sensen,Li Chunping,Xie Yunyun,Xu Dong
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Improper refractive correction can be harmful to eye health, aggravating the burden of vision impairment. During most optometry clinical consultations, practitioner-patient interactions play a key role. Maybe it is feasible for patients themselves to do something to get high-quality optometry. But the present empirical research on the quality improvement of eye care needs to be strengthened. The study aims to test the effect of the brief verbal intervention (BVI) through patients on the quality of optometry service.
Methods
This study will take unannounced standardized patient (USP) with refractive error as the core research tool, both in measurement and intervention. The USP case and the checklist will be developed through a standard protocol and assessed for validity and reliability before its full use. USP will be trained to provide standardized responses during optical visits and receive baseline refraction by the skilled study optometrist who will be recruited within each site. A multi-arm parallel-group randomized trial will be used, with one common control and three intervention groups. The study will be performed in four cities, Guangzhou and three cities in Inner Mongolia, China. A total of 480 optometry service providers (OSPs) will be stratified and randomly selected and divided into four groups. The common control group will receive USP usual visits (without intervention), and three intervention groups will separately receive USP visits with three kinds of BVI on the patient side. A detailed outcome evaluation will include the optometry accuracy, optometry process, patient satisfaction, cost information and service time. Descriptive analysis will be performed for the survey results, and the difference in outcomes between interventions and control providers will be compared and statistically tested using generalized linear models (GLMs).
Discussion
This research will help policymakers understand the current situation and influencing factors of refractive error care quality, and then implement precise policies; at the same time, explore short and easy interventions for patients to improve the quality of optometry service.
Trial registration
Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ChiCTR2200062819. Registered on August 19, 2022.
Funder
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Ophthalmology,General Medicine
Reference32 articles.
1. World Health Organization (WHO).Worldreportonvision.Geneva:WHO. ;2019.Licence:CCBY-NC-SA3.0IGO.
2. GBD 2019 Blindness and Vision Impairment Collaborators; Vision Loss Expert Group of the Global Burden of Disease Study. Causes of blindness and vision impairment in 2020 and trends over 30 years, and prevalence of avoidable blindness in relation to VISION 2020: the right to Sight: an analysis for the global burden of Disease Study. The Lancet Global Health. 2021;9(2):e144–e60.
3. GBD 2019 Blindness and Vision Impairment Collaborators; Vision Loss Expert Group of the Global Burden of Disease Study. Trends in prevalence of blindness and distance and near vision impairment over 30 years: an analysis for the global burden of Disease Study. The Lancet Global Health. 2021;9(2):e130–e43.
4. Ang M, Flanagan JL, Wong CW, Muller A, Davis A, Keys D. Review: myopia control strategies recommendations from the 2018 WHO/IAPB/BHVI meeting on myopia. Br J Ophthalmol. 2020;104(11):1482–7.
5. Lee L, Burnett AM, D’Esposito F, Fricke T, Nguyen LT, Vuong DA. Indicators for assessing the quality of refractive error care. Optom Vis Sci. 2021;98(1):24–31.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献