Author:
Song Xudong,Zhou Jian,Zhang Guangbin,Jia Songbai,Yuan Jun,Hu Ke,Liu Xinhua,Zeng Mingbing,Wang Zhenyu,Tan Baoying,Lu Xingwei,Lin Ailing,Hu Xiaohan,Xuan Jianwei
Abstract
Abstract
Objective
To evaluate the impact on surgical efficiency and labor time cost of preloaded intraocular lens (IOL) implantation system compared with manual IOL implantation system in age-related cataract surgery in China.
Methods
This study was an observational, multicenter, prospective time-motion analysis. IOL preparation time, operation time, cleaning time, number and cost of cataract surgeries in eight participating hospitals were collected. The linear mixed model was used to explore factors associated with the difference in operation time between the preloaded IOL implantation system and the manual IOL implantation system. A time-motion model was constructed to convert the operation time cost saved by using preloaded IOL into economic benefits from hospital and social perspective, respectively.
Results
There were 2,591 cases included in the study (preloaded IOL: 1,591 cases; manual IOL: 1,000 cases). The preloaded IOL implantation system was significant time-saving in both preparation time and operation time compared to the manual IOL implantation system (25.48s vs. 47.04s, P < 0.001 and 353.84s vs. 367.46s, P = 0.004, respectively). An average total of 35.18s can be saved by using preloaded IOL per procedure. The results of linear mixed model showed that the type of IOL was the main factor leading to the difference in preparation time between preloaded IOL and manual IOL implantation system. By switching from manual IOL to preloaded IOL, the model projected additional 392 surgeries can be performed each year and an increase in revenue of $565,282 per hospital, a 9% increase from hospital perspective. And the annual productivity loss saved by using preloaded IOL was $3,006 in eight hospitals from perspective of society.
Conclusion
Compared with manual IOL implantation system, the preloaded IOL implantation system reduces lens preparation time and operation time, which increases potential surgical volume and revenue, and reduces the loss of work productivity. This study provides real-world evidence to support the advantages of the preloaded IOL implantation system in improving efficiency of ophthalmic surgery in China.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Ophthalmology,General Medicine
Reference25 articles.
1. Liu Y-C, Wilkins M, Kim T, Malyugin B, Mehta JS, Cataracts. The Lancet. 2017;390(10094):600–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(17)30544-5
2. Pizzol D, Veronese N, Quaglio G, Di Gennaro F, Deganello D, Stubbs B, et al. The association between diabetes and cataract among 42,469 community-dwelling adults in six low- and middle-income countries. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2019 Jan;147:102–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diabres.2018.12.001. [Medline: 30529577]
3. Song P, Wang H, Theodoratou E, Chan KY, Rudan I. The national and subnational prevalence of cataract and cataract blindness in China: a systematic review and meta-analysis.J Glob Health. 2018Jun;8(1):010804. https://doi.org/10.7189/jogh.08-010804 [Medline: 29977532]
4. Ranking of cataract surgery in China in 2017. 2018 URL: http://www.moheyes.com/News/Details/3bed4465-7e8c-40e3-8532-25eeb128565b; [accessed 2018-03-28]
5. Tan ZFW. Effect of pranoprofen on visual acuity and macular thickness after cataract surgery in diabetic patient. Rec Adv Ophthalmol. 2019;39(02):145-8
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献