Abstract
Abstract
Background
Climate change has perverse effects on the natural resource base and agricultural productivity, negatively affecting the well-being of households and communities. There are various attempts by the government and NGOs to promote climate-smart agricultural (CSA) practices to help farmers adapt to and mitigate these negative impacts. This study aimed to identify CSA practices widely adopted in the study area and examined their impacts on rural farm households’ food security and multidimensional poverty. A three-stage proportional to size sampling procedure was followed to select four districts out of nine districts, and 278 households were randomly selected from two kebeles from each district. A cross-sectional data of the 2020–2021 cropping season were collected using a structured and pretested survey questionnaire. The food consumption score, dietary diversity score, food insecurity experience scale, and multidimensional poverty index, constructed out of 9 indicators, were used to assess households’ food security and poverty status, respectively. A multinomial endogenous switching regression model was used to assess average treatment effects on these outcome indicators.
Results
Widely adopted CSA practices are conservation agriculture, soil fertility management, crop diversification, and small-scale irrigation. The results illustrated that adopter households on average showed more food consumption score, dietary diversity score, and less food insecurity experience scale than non-adopters. The results also showed that CSA adopter households, on average, have a low deprivation score in multidimensional poverty than non-adopter households. Accelerating wider adoption of CSA through up-scaling incentives is quite important.
Conclusion
This study showed that CSA adoption improves households’ food security and reduces multidimensional poverty. We conclude that up-scaling of CSA practices is important for contributing to the achievement of SDG1, SDG2 and SDG13 targets.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Agronomy and Crop Science,Ecology,Food Science
Reference74 articles.
1. Abdulai A, Huffman W. The adoption and impact of soil and water conservation technology: an endogenous switching regression application. Land Econ. 2014;90(1):26–43. https://doi.org/10.3368/le.90.1.26.
2. Adekambi SA.,Diagne A, Simtowe FP, Biaou G. The Impact of Agricultural Technology Adoption on Poverty: The case of NERICA rice varieties in Benin. International Association of Agricultural Economists’ 2009 Conference, Beijing, China. 2009. 1–16. http://ageconsearch.tind.io/record/51645/files/473.pdf.
3. Alkire S, Jahan S. The New Global MPI 2018: Aligning with the Sustainable Development Goals. In United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) (Issue September). 2018. https://www.ophi.org.uk/wpcontent/uploads/OPHIWP121_vs2.pdf%0A.
4. Alkire S, Santos ME. Training material for producing national human reports. MPI: Construction &Analysis, October, 1–35. 2011.
5. Aryal JP, Jat ML, Khatri-Chhetri A, Sapkota TB, Kassie M, Rahut DB, Maharjan S. Adoption of multiple climate-smart agriculture practices in the Gangetic plains of Bihar, India. Int J Climate Change Strateg Manag. 2017;10:407.
Cited by
11 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献