Author:
Tschoner Theresa,Feist Melanie
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Pain in cattle is a major welfare problem, as cattle mask their pain. Subjective and objective parameters to assess pain in cattle have been described. Among the objective parameters to evaluate pain in cattle is substance P (SP). SP is a neurotransmitter, which is involved in the processing of noxious information to the brain; it seems to be a more objective indicator for nociception than cortisol, which has long been used as a biomarker for pain and stress in cattle. The objective of this systematic review was to assess the existing literature about SP during painful procedures, conditions, and diseases in cattle in form of a systematic review.
Results
Following the PRISMA statement, 36 out of 236 studies were included in this systematic review. Study design, grouping, age and weight of animals, processing of blood samples for the assessment of SP, and results were heterogenous. The largest number of studies originated from the United States of America and Canada and were published in 2018. A higher number of studies were done on calves (69.4%, n = 25) compared with adult cattle (30.6%, n = 11). Most studies were done to assess SP concentrations after administration of analgesics prior to husbandry procedures in calves.
Conclusions
There is a manageable number of studies assessing SP concentrations during painful procedures, conditions, and diseases in cattle. SP seems to be a suitable biomarker for nociception in cattle, but results of research work are heterogenous, and SP concentrations of calves and adult cattle differ throughout studies. Basic research work is missing and is needed to assess factors others than nociception which might influence the SP concentrations in the blood plasma.
Funder
Universitätsklinik München
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Veterinary,General Medicine
Reference79 articles.
1. Huxley JN, Whay HR. Current attitudes of cattle practitioners to pain and the use of analgesics in cattle. Vet Rec. 2006;159(20):662–8.
2. Remnant JG, Tremlett A, Huxley JN, Hudson CD. Clinical attitudes to pain and use of analgesia in cattle - Where are we 10-years on? Vet Rec. 2017;181(15):400.
3. Hudson C, Whay H, Huxley J. Recognition and managment of pain in cattle. In Prac. 2008;30(3):126–34.
4. Fraser AF, Broom DM. Describing, recording and measuring behaviour. In: Fraser AF, editor. Farm animal behaviour and welfare. 3rd ed. Broom DM: CAB International; 1990. p. 7–16.
5. Meléndez DM, Marti S, Pajor EA, Moya D, Gellatly D, Janzen ED, Schwartzkopf-Genswein KS. Effect of timing of subcutaneous meloxicam administration on indicators of pain after knife castration of weaned calves. J Anim Sci. 2017;95(12):5218–29.
Cited by
11 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献