Milk yield prediction in Friesian cows using linear and flexible discriminant analysis under assumptions violations

Author:

Moawed Sherif A.,Mahrous Esraa,Elaswad Ahmed,Gouda Hagar F.,Fathy Ahmed

Abstract

Abstract Background The application of novel technologies is now widely used to assist in making optimal decisions. This study aimed to evaluate the performance of linear discriminant analysis (LDA) and flexible discriminant analysis (FDA) in classifying and predicting Friesian cattle’s milk production into low ($$\:<$$4500 kg), medium (4500–7500 kg), and high ($$\:>$$7500 kg) categories. A total of 3793 lactation records from cows calved between 2009 and 2020 were collected to examine some predictors such as age at first calving (AFC), lactation order (LO), days open (DO), days in milk (DIM), dry period (DP), calving season (CFS), 305-day milk yield (305-MY), calving interval (CI), and total breeding per conception (TBRD). Results The comparison between LDA and FDA models was based on the significance of coefficients, total accuracy, sensitivity, precision, and F1-score. The LDA results revealed that DIM and 305-MY were the significant (P < 0.001) contributors for data classification, while the FDA was a lactation order. Classification accuracy results showed that the FDA model performed better than the LDA model in expressing accuracies of correctly classified cases as well as overall classification accuracy of milk yield. The FDA model outperformed LDA in both accuracy and F1-score. It achieved an accuracy of 82% compared to LDA’s 71%. Similarly, the F1-score improved from a range of 0.667 to 0.79 for LDA to a higher range of 0.81 to 0.83 for FDA. Conclusion The findings of this study demonstrated that FDA was more resistant than LDA in case of assumption violations. Furthermore, the current study showed the feasibility and efficacy of LDA and FDA in interpreting and predicting livestock datasets.

Funder

Suez Canal University

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Reference53 articles.

1. Nayak BK, Hazra A. How to choose the right statistical test? Indian J Ophthalmol. 2011;59(2):85.

2. Yan H, Dai Y. The comparison of five discriminant methods. 2011 International Conference on Management and Service Science; Wuhan, China: IEEE; 2011. pp. 1–4.

3. Iyer E, Murti V, Arora V. A Comparison of Artificial Neural Network and Multiple Discriminant Analysis Models for Bankruptcy Prediction in India. Int J Allied Pract Res Rev. 2016;3(1):12–21.

4. Mele M, Macciotta N, Cecchinato A, Conte G, Schiavon S, Bittante G. Multivariate factor analysis of detailed milk fatty acid profile: effects of dairy system, feeding, herd, parity, and stage of lactation. J Dairy Sci. 2016;99(12):9820–33.

5. Moawed SA, Osman MM. The robustness of Binary Logistic Regression and Linear Discriminant Analysis for the classification and differentiation between dairy cows and Buffaloes. Int J Stat Appl. 2017;7(6):304–10.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3