Author:
Moawed Sherif A.,Mahrous Esraa,Elaswad Ahmed,Gouda Hagar F.,Fathy Ahmed
Abstract
Abstract
Background
The application of novel technologies is now widely used to assist in making optimal decisions. This study aimed to evaluate the performance of linear discriminant analysis (LDA) and flexible discriminant analysis (FDA) in classifying and predicting Friesian cattle’s milk production into low ($$\:<$$4500 kg), medium (4500–7500 kg), and high ($$\:>$$7500 kg) categories. A total of 3793 lactation records from cows calved between 2009 and 2020 were collected to examine some predictors such as age at first calving (AFC), lactation order (LO), days open (DO), days in milk (DIM), dry period (DP), calving season (CFS), 305-day milk yield (305-MY), calving interval (CI), and total breeding per conception (TBRD).
Results
The comparison between LDA and FDA models was based on the significance of coefficients, total accuracy, sensitivity, precision, and F1-score. The LDA results revealed that DIM and 305-MY were the significant (P < 0.001) contributors for data classification, while the FDA was a lactation order. Classification accuracy results showed that the FDA model performed better than the LDA model in expressing accuracies of correctly classified cases as well as overall classification accuracy of milk yield. The FDA model outperformed LDA in both accuracy and F1-score. It achieved an accuracy of 82% compared to LDA’s 71%. Similarly, the F1-score improved from a range of 0.667 to 0.79 for LDA to a higher range of 0.81 to 0.83 for FDA.
Conclusion
The findings of this study demonstrated that FDA was more resistant than LDA in case of assumption violations. Furthermore, the current study showed the feasibility and efficacy of LDA and FDA in interpreting and predicting livestock datasets.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference53 articles.
1. Nayak BK, Hazra A. How to choose the right statistical test? Indian J Ophthalmol. 2011;59(2):85.
2. Yan H, Dai Y. The comparison of five discriminant methods. 2011 International Conference on Management and Service Science; Wuhan, China: IEEE; 2011. pp. 1–4.
3. Iyer E, Murti V, Arora V. A Comparison of Artificial Neural Network and Multiple Discriminant Analysis Models for Bankruptcy Prediction in India. Int J Allied Pract Res Rev. 2016;3(1):12–21.
4. Mele M, Macciotta N, Cecchinato A, Conte G, Schiavon S, Bittante G. Multivariate factor analysis of detailed milk fatty acid profile: effects of dairy system, feeding, herd, parity, and stage of lactation. J Dairy Sci. 2016;99(12):9820–33.
5. Moawed SA, Osman MM. The robustness of Binary Logistic Regression and Linear Discriminant Analysis for the classification and differentiation between dairy cows and Buffaloes. Int J Stat Appl. 2017;7(6):304–10.