Abstract
AbstractTotal protein levels in fish are widely used in health and welfare studies, providing a simple and accessible measure. However, the multifaceted role of blood proteins makes it sometimes challenging to link total protein content to specific health issues, while specific protein fractions may offer more precise insights into fish biology and health, particularly in farmed fish species where such data is often lacking. Data were gathered from two experiments involving Dicentrarchus labrax and Sparus aurata, key species in European marine aquaculture. The aim was (1) to assess how different globulin fractions contribute to total protein content in blood and (2) how these contributions vary across different sampling times in healthy animals. In D. labrax, the beta1 globulin fraction emerged as the major contributor (34.16%), followed by albumin and alpha2 globulins (18.24% and 16.41%, respectively). In contrast, pre-albumins and alpha1 fractions had the least contribution (5.49% and 7.71%). S. aurata exhibited albumin as the primary contributor (23.39%), followed by beta1 and alpha2 globulins (19.71% and 19.15%, respectively), with gamma and alpha1 fractions contributing the least (5.34% and 8.63%). Notably, the study revealed relatively stable contributions of globulin fractions to total proteins within both species, albeit with minor variations over time, potentially linked to environmental and individual factors. Furthermore, larger fish displayed higher total protein levels. This research underscores the need for further investigation into the diverse factors influencing globulin contributions to total proteins, ultimately enhancing health and welfare monitoring for farmed fish species.
Funder
Horizon 2020 research and innovation program
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference60 articles.
1. FAO. The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture 2022. Towards Blue Transformation. Rome. 2022.
2. European Food Safety Authority. General approach to fish welfare and to the concept of sentience in fish - scientific opinion of the Panel on Animal Health and Welfare. EFSA J. 2009;June:1–27.
3. Ashley PJ. Fish welfare: current issues in aquaculture. Appl Anim Behav Sci. 2007;104:199–235.
4. Huntingford FA, Adams C, Braithwaite VA, Kadri S, Pottinger TG, Sandøe P, et al. Current issues in fish welfare. J Fish Biol. 2006;44:332–72.
5. Arlinghaus R, Cooke SJ, Schwab A, Cowx IG. Fish welfare: a challenge to the feelings-based approach, with implications for recreational fishing. Fish Fish. 2007;8:57–71.