Abstract
Abstract
Background
Glycomer 631 and lactomer 9–1 are absorbable suture materials indicated for soft tissue approximation in non-infected wounds. Pigs are often used as surgical models in translational research; however, reports of tissue reactions to both suture materials in pigs are limited. The aim of this study was to assess clinical and histologic responses of skin incisions closed with a subcuticular technique using glycomer 631 and lactomer 9–1 in pigs.
Results
Skin incisions on 17 pigs were closed with glycomer 631 and lactomer 9–1, and a clinical reactive score (CRS) including erythema, swelling, discharge and dehiscence was calculated on postoperative days 7 and 14. Subcuticular tissue reaction was assessed histologically on postoperative day 14 (the presence of extravascular neutrophils, macrophages, multinucleated giant cells, lymphocytes, fibroblasts, bacterial colonies and the overall severity of the inflammatory response to the suture material), and the cumulative score of the variables was calculated as an aggregate tissue irritation score (ATIS). Tissue samples were examined for suture extrusion and evaluated microbiologically. The clinical reactive score did not differ between the suture materials. Only one ATIS variable, namely the overall severity of the inflammatory response, was lower (p = 0.029) when glycomer 631 was used. Suture extrusion was found in 10/17 of the incisions closed by glycomer 631 and in 7/13 of the incisions closed by lactomer 9–1. Trueperella pyogenes was isolated from the skin and from the area of tissue reaction in six pigs.
Conclusions
No difference in CRS between the suture materials was observed, and thus both materials may be used for the subcuticular technique in pigs. Glycomer 631 induced less tissue reaction only in terms of the overall severity of the inflammatory response. Suture extrusion was observed in more than 50% of incisions regardless of the suture material, possibly due to a large amount of suture material in the wound. Trueperella pyogenes was the only pathogen isolated from the tissue surrounding the suture material.
Funder
Javna Agencija za Raziskovalno Dejavnost RS
University Medical Centre Ljubljana
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Veterinary,General Medicine
Reference32 articles.
1. Fahie MA. Primary wound closure. In: Johnston SA, Tobias KM, editors. Veterinary surgery. Small animal. 2nd ed. St Louis: Elsevier; 2018. p. 1397–410.
2. Boothe HW. Selecting suture materials for small animal surgery. Compend Contin Educ Pract Vet. 1998;20:155–63.
3. Kirpensteijn J, Maarschalkerweerd RJ, Koeman JP, Kooistra HS, van Sluijs FJ. Comparison of two suture materials for intradermal skin closure in dogs. Vet Q. 1997;19:20–2.
4. Austin PE, Dunn KA, Eily-Cofield K, Brown CK, Wooden WA, Bradfield JF. Subcuticular sutures and the rate of inflammation in noncontaminated wounds. Ann Emerg Med. 1995;25:328–30.
5. Sylvestre A, Wilson J, Hare J. A comparison of 2 different suture patterns for skin closure of canine ovariohysterectomy. Can Vet J. 2002;43:699–702.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献