Author:
Hefnawy Eman,Elgazzar Eman,Sabek Ahmed,El-laithy Saeed,Ahmed Souad
Abstract
Abstract
Background
The current study was conducted to assess the impact of different LED light colors on welfare indicators in Muscovy ducks. These welfare parameters encompassed growth performance, specific behaviors, tonic immobility (TI), feather score, haematological, and serum biochemical parameters. Eighty-four healthy unsexed Muscovy ducklings aged two weeks were randomly assigned to four groups (3replicates/group; each replicate contains 7 birds) based on different LED light colors. The first group was raised under white light, the second under red light, the third under blue light, and the fourth under yellow light. To assess the impact of various LED light colors on welfare, growth performance indicators (body weight, body weight gain, feed intake, and feed conversion ratio) were measured. Behavioral patterns including feeding, drinking, standing, walking, sitting, feather pecking, and other activities were recorded. Tonic immobility test (TI) and feather condition scoring were conducted at 3, 6, and 10 weeks of age. At the end of the study blood samples were collected for hematological and serum biochemical analyses.
Results
The results revealed that using blue, yellow, and red colors had no adverse effect on the final body weight of the ducks (P > 0.05). Unlike to red light, blue light significantly reduced feather pecking, TI time and cortisol concentrations and improved the feather condition score (P ≤ 0.05).
Conclusions
The current findings suggest that the application of blue light effectively improves welfare indices and has no detrimental impact on the growth performance of Muscovy ducks thereby positively contributing to their welfare.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference47 articles.
1. Hassan FAM, Roushdy EM, Zaglool AW, Ali MA, El-Araby IE. Growth performance, carcass traits and economic values of pekin, muscovy, and mulard ducks. Slov Vet Res. 2018;55(January):357–65.
2. Saez G, Davail S, Gentès G, Hocquette JF, Jourdan T, Degrace P, et al. Gene expression and protein content in relation to intramuscular fat content in Muscovy and Pekin ducks. Poult Sci. 2009;88(11):2382–91.
3. Zeng T, Zhang L, Li J, Wang D, Tian Y, Lu L. De novo assembly and characterization of Muscovy duck liver transcriptome and analysis of differentially regulated genes in response to heat stress. Cell Stress Chaperones. 2015;20(3):83–493.
4. Aronal AP, Huda N, Ahmad R. Amino acid and fatty acid profiles of Peking and Muscovy duck meat. Int J Poult Sci. 2012;11(3):229–36.
5. Huang Y, Li Y, Burt DW, Chen H, Zhang Y, Qian W, et al. The duck genome and transcriptome provide insight into an avian influenza virus reservoir species. Nat Genet. 2013;45(7):776–83.