Author:
Scaglione Jessie,Carver Jacqueline
Abstract
Abstract
Objective
To determine the influence of two intraoperative pain management protocols on the need for additional opioids in patients receiving an epidural and periarticular liposomal bupivacaine (PLB) vs. PLB alone in the 12–24 h period after undergoing a TPLO.
Study design
Retrospective study.
Animals
One hundred seventy-four dogs with cranial cruciate ligament tears presenting for TPLO.
Methods
Medical records of dogs presenting for a unilateral or bilateral cranial cruciate ligament tear who had a TPLO performed were reviewed for signalment, weight, body condition score, and peri-operative pain management protocol. Dogs were divided into two groups: those who received an epidural and PLB, and those who received only PLB. Post-operative opioid administration was recorded for each group.
Results
Patients who received an epidural and PLB received fewer postoperative opioids. There were 36% fewer opioid injections administered to dogs who received epidurals compared to dogs who did not receive epidurals (IRR) (95% CI) = 0.64 (0.45–0.92), P = 0.02). BCS was not a significant predictor of the post-operative opioid requirement (IRR (95% CI) = 1.3 (0.75–2.4), P = 0.38). When adjusting for BCS as a possible confounder, there were 39% fewer opioid injections in dogs who received epidurals than dogs without (IRR (95% CI) = 0.61 (0.42–0.88), P = 0.009).
Conclusions
The incidence of postoperative opioid administration was significantly diminished in patients receiving both an epidural and PLB.
Clinical significance
Administration of an epidural in addition to infiltration of PLB significantly decreased the incidence of postoperative opioid administration in dogs undergoing a TPLO.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Veterinary,General Medicine