Abstract
Abstract
Background
The rehabilitation of injured wildlife and their subsequent release into the wild is a humane act as well as important in wildlife conservation. However, little is known about the animals’ fate after release. Therefore, to address these uncertainties, it is essential to adequately describe how the injured animals were treated and managed before releasing into the wild; moreover, post-release monitoring should also be performed. Herein, we document for the first time the process of rescue, surgery, and rehabilitation of severely injured Asiatic black bears (Ursus thibetanus; endangered species in South Korea) and their fate after returning to the wild.
Case presentation
A six-year-old female (bear-01) and a three-year-old male (bear-02) bears were injured by an illegal snare and collision with a bus, respectively. Bear-01 had broad muscle necrosis and ruptures from the snared ankle on the right thoracic limb, with myiasis, and elbow disarticulation was performed. In bear-02, a non-reducible comminuted fracture of the left humerus was confirmed radiologically, and the operation was performed by using dual plate fixation with hydroxyapatite and recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2. The bear-01 and -02 were completely healed approximately 30 and 60 days after surgery, respectively. After that, they underwent rehabilitation for 8 and 25 days, respectively, in an outdoor enclosure similar to their natural habitat. Bear-01 and -02 were released into the wild after 45 and 99 days after surgery, respectively, and their mean daily movement distance during the first 30 days after releasing was 2.9 ± 2.1 and 1.3 ± 1.6 km, respectively. The annual mean 95% Kernel home-range size of bear-01 and bear-02 was 265.8 and 486.9 km2, respectively. They hibernated every winter, gained weight, gave birth to cubs (bear-01), were not found to have any abnormalities in the veterinary tests, and were not involved in any conflicts with humans after returning to the wild.
Conclusions
Bears without one leg or those with dual plates could adapt well in their natural habitat, which shows that our surgical and post-operative treatments were effective. Additionally, minimizing human contact and observing/evaluating behavior during the rehabilitation is essential in reducing human-bear conflicts after release.
Funder
Rural Development Administration, Republic of Korea
Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs, Republic of Korea
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Veterinary,General Medicine
Reference52 articles.
1. Saran KA, Parker G, Parker R, Dickman CR. Rehabilitation as a conservation tool: a case study using the common wombat. Pac Conserv Biol. 2011;17(4):310–9. https://doi.org/10.1071/PC110310.
2. Guy AJ, Curnoe D, Banks PB. A survey of current mammal rehabilitation and release practices. Biodivers Conserv. 2013;22(4):825–37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-013-0452-1.
3. Mullineaux E. Veterinary treatment and rehabilitation of indigenous wildlife. J Small Anim Pract. 2014;55(6):293–300. https://doi.org/10.1111/jsap.12213.
4. Dubois S, Fraser D. Conversations with stakeholders, part 1: goals, impediments, and relationships in wildlife rehabilitation. J Wildl Rehabil. 2003;26:14–22.
5. Kirkwood JK, Sainsbury AW. Ethics of interventions for the welfare of free-living wild animals. Anim Welf. 1996;5:235–43.
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献