Author:
Ribette Cécile,Rosenthal Lucie,Raynaud Jean-Philippe,Franchitto Ludivine,Revet Alexis
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Parental psychiatric disorders can have a significant impact on child development and the parent-infant bond, with a high risk of attachment disorders. Early identification of difficulties in the parent–child relationship is essential to prevent consequences for the child. Childcare practitioners have a major role to play in this early detection process, through regular mandatory consultations during the first two years of a child's life. Thus, the aim of this study was to collect the experience of private practitioners in their care of children of parents with a mental health illness.
Method
This is a cross-sectional, observational, qualitative study. Data were collected by means of semi-structured interviews with eleven general practitioners and private paediatricians between February and July 2021 in Toulouse and its suburbs. We only included practitioners who had followed children of parents with a mental health illness. The interviews were recorded with the agreement of the participants, before being transcribed anonymously. The data were analysed with NVivo software using interpretative phenomenological analysis.
Results
Three main themes emerged from the results, which were further divided into several sub-themes. Addressing psychiatric disorders presents a risk for the therapeutic relationship. Practitioners express a need to preserve this relationship with the parent in joint care. Care is difficult and is permeated by the parents' emotional issues. Furthermore, practitioners face a conflict between their concerns for the parent–child bond and their desire not to stigmatise these families. They express a feeling of isolation in these follow-ups. This stressful care has a significant emotional impact on the doctors. Access to psychiatric training and multidisciplinary collaboration seem to be essential to improve the follow-up experience for practitioners, as these factors strengthen inter-professional connections.
Conclusion
Practitioners describe a parent-doctor relationship at risk, which is underpinned by the fear of care placement. This study illustrates the need to strengthen multidisciplinary work by promoting interprofessional exchanges, in order to improve the experience of practitioners in this care process. Addressing practitioners’ fear of discussing parental psychiatric illness is very important, so as not to delay the implementation of preventive actions that are likely to improve the developmental prognosis for children.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference49 articles.
1. Kaplan K, Salzer MS. Future directions for supporting parents with a mental illness: commentary on Schrank et al. (2015). Soc Psychiatry Psychiatric Epidemiol. 2016;51(6):795-7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-016-1217-4.
2. University of York, Social Policy Research Unit, U. of Y. Social Care Institute for Excellence (Great Britain), et Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, Technical report for SCIE research review on the prevalence and incidence of parental mental health problems and the detection, screening and reporting of parental mental health problems. York: Social Policy Research Unit, 2008.
3. Maybery DJ, Reupert AE, Patrick K, Goodyear M, Crase L. Prevalence of parental mental illness in Australian families. Psychiatr Bull. 2009;33(1):22-6. https://doi.org/10.1192/pb.bp.107.018861.
4. Nicholson J, Biebel K, Katz-Leavy J, Williams V. The prevalence of parenthood in adults with mental illness: implications for state and federal policymakers, programs, and providers. Popul. Dyn. p. 19.
5. Chan SY, Ho GW, Bressington D. Experiences of self‐stigmatization and parenting in Chinese mothers with severe mental illness. Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2019; 28(2):527‑537. https://doi.org/10.1111/inm.12558.