Patient perspective on task shifting from general practitioners to medical practice assistants – a quantitative survey in Germany

Author:

Kuschick Doreen,Dierks Marius Tibor,Grittner Ulrike,Heintze Christoph,Kümpel Lisa,Riens Burgi,Rost Liliana,Schmidt Konrad,Schulze Daniel,Toutaoui Kahina,Wolf Florian,Döpfmer Susanne

Abstract

Abstract Introduction Various developments result in increasing workloads in general practices. New models of care and a restructuring of the division of tasks could provide relief. One approach is to extend the delegation of medical tasks from general practitioners (GPs) to medical practice assistants (MPAs). So far, there has been a lack of information about specific situations in which patients are willing to be treated exclusively by MPAs. Methods In three German federal states, patients who visited a general practice were surveyed exploratively and cross-sectionally with a self-designed, paper-based questionnaire. The data were analysed descriptively and multivariate. A mixed binary logistic regression model was calculated to account for cluster effects at practice level (random intercept model). The dependent variable was patients' acceptance of task delegation. Results A total of 1861 questionnaires from 61 general practices were included in the analysis. Regarding the current problem/request, a total of 30% of respondents could imagine being treated only by MPAs. Regarding theoretical reasons for consultation, more than half of the patients agreed to be treated by MPAs. According to the regression model, MPAs were preferred when patients were younger (10-year OR = 0.84, 95%-CI [0.75, 0.93]) or had a less complicated issue (OR = 0.44, 95%-CI [0.26, 0.8]). For four current problems/requests (“acute complaints” OR = 0.27, 95%-CI [0.17, 0.45], “routine health check” OR = 0.48, 95%-CI [0.3, 0.79], “new problem” OR = 0.13, 95%-CI [0.06, 0.28], “known problem” OR = 0.16, 95%-CI [0.1, 0.27]) patients prefer to be treated by GPs instead of MPAs. Discussion For the first time, statements could be made on patients’ acceptance of task delegation in relation to current and theoretical reasons for treatment in general practices in Germany. The discrepancy in response behaviour on a theoretical and individual level could be explained by different contexts of questions and differences at practice level. Overall, patients seem to be open to increased delegation of medical tasks, depending on the reason for treatment. Selection and response biases should be considered in the interpretation. Conclusion The results are not completely opposed to an extension of task delegation. Further interventional studies could provide information on the possible effects of expansion of delegable tasks.

Funder

Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Family Practice

Reference49 articles.

1. World Health Organization. Ageing and health. 2021. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/ageing-and-health. Accessed 03 Jan 2023.

2. United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs Population Division. World Population Ageing 2019. 2020. https://www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/publications/pdf/ageing/WorldPopulationAgeing2019-Report.pdf. Accessed 07 Feb 2023.

3. World Health Organization. Multimorbidity. 2016. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/252275. Accessed 03 Jan 2023.

4. World Health Organization. Non communicable diseases. 2021. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/noncommunicable-diseases. Accessed 03 Jan 2023.

5. Statista Research Department. Forecast for the shortage of skilled workers in healthcare professions in Germany up to the years 2020 and 2030. 2016. https://de.statista.com/statistik/daten/studie/703367/umfrage/fachkraefteengpass-in-gesundheitswirtschaftlichen-berufen-in-deutschland-bis-2030/. Accessed 03 Jan 2023.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3