Self-management support (SMS) in primary care practice: a qualitative focus group study of care professionals’ experiences

Author:

Timmermans Lotte,Boeykens Dagje,Sirimsi Muhammed Mustafa,Van de Velde Dominique,De Vriendt Patricia,Decat Peter,Foulon Veerle,Van Hecke Ann,Vermandere Mieke,Schoenmakers Birgitte,

Abstract

Abstract Background To support self-management of chronically ill persons, innovative approaches of care practice are being developed. Unfortunately, many self-management supporting interventions struggle to achieve reliable and consistent improvements at various levels (patient, provider and healthcare system level). One possible strategy to facilitate translating theory into practice, is to consider the healthcare professionals’ perspective prior to the development of new interventions. An exploration of their knowledge and opinion about barriers and facilitators is necessary before employing any self-management support (SMS) intervention. Therefore, our study aims to explore care professionals’ perspectives about SMS within the Flemish primary care setting. Methods This study used a qualitative study design to examine SMS in primary care setting. Five focus groups were conducted, grouped into three waves. Participants were healthcare professionals in Flanders representing different disciplines and settings. A maximum variation purposive sampling was used to recruit participants. For the data analysis, the framework of thematic networks by Attride-Stirling was applied. Results A total of 34 healthcare professionals participated. Three global themes related to SMS were derived from the thematic analysis: (1) Characteristics, (2) Support strategies, (3) Barriers and facilitators. SMS was characterised as a collaboration-based and person-centred approach. A variety of supporting strategies were mentioned by the focus group participants. Most strategies consisted of informing and educating patients. Complementary to individual strategies, collaborative strategies were deemed necessary to support self-management. Regarding barriers and facilitators, different patient-related factors were identified. Additionally, competencies of healthcare providers and external factors seem to hinder the implementation of SMS in practice. Conclusions This focus group study highlights the importance of a collaborative, person-centred approach to SMS in the context of chronic diseases. Our findings point to the need for interventions that raise awareness and address barriers associated with SMS. Since generic SMS does not exist, the road to success is a growth process in which support must be adapted to the individual patient.

Funder

dr. Daniël De Coninck

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Reference53 articles.

1. Commission E. Horizon 2020. 2020. Available from: https://ec.europa.eu/programmes/horizon2020/en/area/health. [Cited 2020 Dec 22].

2. Busse R, Scheller-Kreinsen D. Zentner A Tackling chronic disease in Europe: Strategies. WHO Regional Office Europe: Interventions and Challenges; 2010.

3. Control COD. European Health Report 2018: More Than Numbers - Evidence for All. World Health Organization; 2019.

4. Efpia. IT’S TIME TO POWER UP HEALTH SYSTEMS: a vision for future-proof health systems. Available from: https://www.efpia.eu/about-medicines/use-of-medicines/healthcare-systems/introduction/. [Cited 2022 May 29]

5. Farrell C. Patient and public involvement in health: the evidence for policy implementation: a summary of the results of the Health in Partnership research programme. Department of Health; 2004. p. 69.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3