Self-management support (SMS) in primary care practice: a qualitative focus group study of care professionals’ experiences
-
Published:2024-03-01
Issue:1
Volume:25
Page:
-
ISSN:2731-4553
-
Container-title:BMC Primary Care
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:BMC Prim. Care
Author:
Timmermans Lotte,Boeykens Dagje,Sirimsi Muhammed Mustafa,Van de Velde Dominique,De Vriendt Patricia,Decat Peter,Foulon Veerle,Van Hecke Ann,Vermandere Mieke,Schoenmakers Birgitte,
Abstract
Abstract
Background
To support self-management of chronically ill persons, innovative approaches of care practice are being developed. Unfortunately, many self-management supporting interventions struggle to achieve reliable and consistent improvements at various levels (patient, provider and healthcare system level). One possible strategy to facilitate translating theory into practice, is to consider the healthcare professionals’ perspective prior to the development of new interventions. An exploration of their knowledge and opinion about barriers and facilitators is necessary before employing any self-management support (SMS) intervention. Therefore, our study aims to explore care professionals’ perspectives about SMS within the Flemish primary care setting.
Methods
This study used a qualitative study design to examine SMS in primary care setting. Five focus groups were conducted, grouped into three waves. Participants were healthcare professionals in Flanders representing different disciplines and settings. A maximum variation purposive sampling was used to recruit participants. For the data analysis, the framework of thematic networks by Attride-Stirling was applied.
Results
A total of 34 healthcare professionals participated. Three global themes related to SMS were derived from the thematic analysis: (1) Characteristics, (2) Support strategies, (3) Barriers and facilitators. SMS was characterised as a collaboration-based and person-centred approach. A variety of supporting strategies were mentioned by the focus group participants. Most strategies consisted of informing and educating patients. Complementary to individual strategies, collaborative strategies were deemed necessary to support self-management. Regarding barriers and facilitators, different patient-related factors were identified. Additionally, competencies of healthcare providers and external factors seem to hinder the implementation of SMS in practice.
Conclusions
This focus group study highlights the importance of a collaborative, person-centred approach to SMS in the context of chronic diseases. Our findings point to the need for interventions that raise awareness and address barriers associated with SMS. Since generic SMS does not exist, the road to success is a growth process in which support must be adapted to the individual patient.
Funder
dr. Daniël De Coninck
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference53 articles.
1. Commission E. Horizon 2020. 2020. Available from: https://ec.europa.eu/programmes/horizon2020/en/area/health. [Cited 2020 Dec 22].
2. Busse R, Scheller-Kreinsen D. Zentner A Tackling chronic disease in Europe: Strategies. WHO Regional Office Europe: Interventions and Challenges; 2010.
3. Control COD. European Health Report 2018: More Than Numbers - Evidence for All. World Health Organization; 2019.
4. Efpia. IT’S TIME TO POWER UP HEALTH SYSTEMS: a vision for future-proof health systems. Available from: https://www.efpia.eu/about-medicines/use-of-medicines/healthcare-systems/introduction/. [Cited 2022 May 29]
5. Farrell C. Patient and public involvement in health: the evidence for policy implementation: a summary of the results of the Health in Partnership research programme. Department of Health; 2004. p. 69.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献