Abstract
Abstract
Background
Considering the global refugee crisis, there is an increasing demand on primary care physicians to be able to adequately assess and address the health care needs of individual refugees, including both the somatic and psychiatric spectra. Meanwhile, intercultural consultations are often described as challenging, and studies exploring physician–patient communication focusing on emotional distress are lacking. Therefore, the aim was to explore physician–patient communication, with focus on cultural aspects of emotional distress in intercultural primary care consultations, using a grounded theory approach, considering both the physician’s and the patient’s perspective.
Methods
The study was set in Region Stockholm, Sweden. In total, 23 individual interviews and 3 focus groups were conducted. Resident physicians in family medicine and patients with refugee backgrounds, originating from Somalia, Syria, Afghanistan and Iraq, were included. Data was analysed using a grounded theory approach.
Results
Over time, primary care patients with refugee backgrounds seemed to adopt a culturally congruent model of emotional distress. Gradual acceptance of psychiatric diagnoses as explanatory models for distress and suffering was noted, which is in line with current tendencies in Sweden. This acculturation might be influenced by the physician. Three possible approaches used by residents in intercultural consultations were identified: “biomedical”, “didactic” and “compensatory”. They all indicated that diagnoses are culturally valid models to explain various forms of distress and may thus contribute to shifting patient perceptions of psychiatric diagnoses.
Conclusions
Physicians working in Swedish primary care may influence patients’ acculturation process by inadvertently shifting their perceptions of psychiatric diagnoses. Residents expressed concerns, rather than confidence, in dealing with these issues. Focusing part of their training on how to address emotional distress in an intercultural context would likely be beneficial for all parties concerned.
Funder
Forskningsrådet om Hälsa, Arbetsliv och Välfärd
Karolinska Institute
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference48 articles.
1. Silove D, Ventevogel P, Rees S. The contemporary refugee crisis: an overview of mental health challenges. World Psych. 2017;16(2):130–9.
2. Priebe S, Giacco D, El-Nagib R. WHO health evidence network synthesis reports. Public health aspects of mental health among migrants and refugees: a review of the evidence on mental health care for refugees, Asylum seekers and irregular migrants in the WHO European Region. Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe (c) World Health Organization 2016; 2016.
3. Hassan G, Kirmayer LJ, Mekki-Berrada A, Quosh C, el Chammay R, Deville-Stoetzel J, et al. Culture, context and the mental health and psychosocial wellbeing of Syrians: a review for mental health and psychosocial support staff working with Syrians affected by armed conflict. Geneva: United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees; 2015.
4. Berry JW. Immigration, acculturation, and adaptation. Appl Psychol. 1997;46(1):5–34.
5. Goldberg SD. Are official psychiatric classification systems for mental disorders suitable for use in primary care? Brit J Gen Pract J Royal College Gen Practitioners. 2019;69(680):108–9.