Abstract
Abstract
Background
Medical assistants are essential for the healthcare system. However, they face several working demands every day, for which they need resources to cope. While several studies show that humour can be a resource for healthcare professionals, studies on humour styles/comic styles in healthcare are scarce. But, as humour styles (e.g., light vs. dark) may have varying – and even negative – effects on positive psychological functioning, it is important to investigate their individual potential for medical assistants. Thus, this study investigates the relationships between medical assistants’ comic styles and their positive psychological functioning at work.
Methods
Applying a cross-sectional design we assessed German medical assistants’ eight comic styles (i.e., benevolent humour, fun, wit, nonsense, irony, satire, sarcasm, cynicism) and facets of positive psychological functioning (e.g., well-being, feeling of competence). We analysed relationships between the variables by means of Pearson correlations, ANCOVAs and hierarchical regressions. All analyses were conducted with the total sample (N = 608; completion rate 44%) as well as a large subsample of medical assistants working in general medicine (N = 263).
Results
While most of the light styles (e.g., benevolent humour) relate positively to most facets, the dark style sarcasm relates negatively. The other dark styles showed coefficients around zero or even slightly positive ones (e.g., satire). Most relationships were also prevalent in the subgroup of medical assistants working in general medicine.
Conclusions
The eight comic styles might have varying potential for medical assistants’ positive psychological functioning at work, with benevolent humour being most adaptive and sarcasm being maladaptive. This study points to the relevance of raising attention regarding the (mal-)adaptiveness of different comic styles of healthcare professionals. Trainings of professionals (e.g., vocational education and training of medical assistants) might integrate the topic of humour (i.e., foster benevolent vs. caution against sarcastic humour) to build and maintain this helpful resource which professionals can use as a tool to master various challenges of everyday work (e.g., cope with stressful situations).
Funder
Bundesinstitut für Berufsbildung
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference63 articles.
1. Erstling U, Karberg K, Steffens-Korbanka P. Medical assistant – a changing profession. Z Für Rheumatologie. 2019;78(5):413–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00393-019-0610-2. (in German).
2. Taché S, Hill-Sakurai L. Medical assistants: the invisible glue of primary health care practices in the United States? J Health Organ Manag. 2010;24(3):288–305. https://doi.org/10.1108/14777261011054626.
3. Bundesinstitut für Berufsbildung. Ausbildung gestalten - Medizinische Fachangestellte/Medizinischer Fachangestellter - Erläuterungen und Praxishilfen zur Ausbildungsordnung (2nd ed.). Bertelsmann. 2009; Retrieved March 15, 2024, from https://www.bibb.de/dienst/berufesuche/de/index_berufesuche.php/profile/apprenticeship/n233444?page=3.
4. BIBB-DAZUBI-Datenbank. Datenbank Auszubildende - Medizinische/-r Fachangestellte/-r. 2023. Data of the Federal Institute of Vocational Education and Training in Germany. https://www.bibb.de/dienst/dazubi/dazubi/datasheet/download/30-81102820.pdf.
5. Statistik nach der Pflegeberufe- Ausbildungsfinanzierungsverordnung. 2022, Tables 21241-02, Statistisches Bundesamt (Destatis), 2023. https://www.destatis.de/DE/Themen/Gesellschaft-Umwelt/Bildung-Forschung-Kultur/Berufliche-Bildung/Publikationen/Downloads-Berufliche-Bildung/statistischer-bericht-pflegeberufe-ausbildungsfinanzierung-vo-5212401227005.html.