Author:
Goetz Teddy G.,Wolk Courtney Benjamin
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Transgender, non-binary, and/or gender expansive (TNG) individuals experience disproportionately high rates of mental illness and unique barriers to accessing psychiatric care. Integrating TNG-specific psychiatric care with other physical health services may improve engagement, but little published literature describes patient and clinician perspectives on such models of care. Here we present a formative evaluation aiming to inform future projects integrating psychiatric care with physical health care for TNG individuals.
Methods
In this qualitative pre-implementation study, semi-structured interview guides were developed informed by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research to ensure uniform inclusion and sequencing of topics and allow for valid comparison across interviews. We elicited TNG patient (n = 11) and gender-affirming care clinician (n = 10) needs and preferences regarding integrating psychiatric care with other gender-affirming clinical services. We conducted a rapid analysis procedure, yielding a descriptive analysis for each participant group, identifying challenges of and opportunities in offering integrated gender-affirming psychiatric care.
Results
Participants unanimously preferred integrating psychiatry within primary care instead of siloed service models. All participants preferred that patients have access to direct psychiatry appointments (rather than psychiatrist consultation with care team only) and all gender-affirming care clinicians wanted increased access to psychiatric consultations. The need for flexible, tailored care was emphasized. Facilitators identified included taking insurance, telehealth, clinician TNG-competence, and protecting time for clinicians to collaborate and obtain consultation.
Conclusions
This health equity pre-implementation project engaged TNG patients and gender-affirming care clinicians to inform future research exploring integration of mental health care with primary care for the TNG community and suggests utility of such a model of care.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference45 articles.
1. Grant JM, Motter LA, Tanis J. Injustice at every turn: a report of the national transgender discrimination survey. Washington: National Centre for Transgender Equality; 2011. Available from: https://transequality.org/sites/default/files/docs/resources/NTDS_Report.pdf. Last accessed: 10 Sept 2023..
2. Ashley F, Domínguez S. Transgender healthcare does not stop at the doorstep of the clinic. Am J Med. 2021;134(2):158–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2020.09.030.
3. Dalton MR, Jones A, Stoy J. Reducing barriers: integrated collaboration for transgender clients. J Fem Fam Ther. 2020;32(3–4):176–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/08952833.2020.1848050.
4. Safer JD, Coleman E, Feldman J, et al. Barriers to healthcare for transgender individuals. Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes Obes. 2016;23(2):168–71. https://doi.org/10.1097/MED.0000000000000227.
5. Thompson HM, Clement AM, Ortiz R, et al. Community engagement to improve access to healthcare: a comparative case study to advance implementation science for transgender health equity. Int J Equity Health. 2022;21(1):104. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-022-01702-8.