Author:
Aoki Takuya,Matsushima Masato
Abstract
Abstract
Background
To ensure that high-quality primary care is available to every individual, increasing the proportion of residents with a usual source of care (USC) is a challenge for each country. However, the status of USC after the spread of COVID-19 and the factors associated with it remain unclear internationally. Therefore, we aimed to explore the associations of sociodemographic and clinical factors with the presence and type of USC (kakaritsukei in Japanese) during the pandemic in Japan.
Methods
We conducted a nationwide cross-sectional survey of a representative sample of the general Japanese adult population in May 2021. The main outcome measures were the presence and type of USC. We assessed sociodemographic and clinical factors, including age, gender, marital status, years of education, employment status, annual household income, social isolation, health literacy, number of chronic conditions, and health-related quality of life.
Results
Of the 1,757 participants, 1,011 (57.5%) had a USC. There were 769 (76.1%) participants who had a USC in a clinic and 227 (22.5%) in a hospital. As a result of multivariable modified Poisson regression analysis, male gender, no chronic condition, lower health literacy, and social isolation were significantly associated with not having a USC. Among participants with a USC, male gender, the presence of one or more chronic conditions, and lower health-related quality of life were associated with having a hospital-based USC.
Conclusions
We identified factors associated with the status of USC during the COVID-19 pandemic, including health literacy and social isolation. These findings provide primary care providers and policymakers with insight into the potential barriers to having a USC in the aftermath of the pandemic.
Funder
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference29 articles.
1. Primary Care Collaborative. Relationships Matter: How Usual is Usual Source of (Primary) Care? Published 2022. Accessed February 8., 2023. https://www.pcpcc.org/sites/default/files/resources/pcc-evidence-report-2022_1.pdf.
2. Kim MY, Kim JH, Choi IK, Hwang IH, Kim SY. Effects of having usual source of care on preventive services and chronic disease control: a systematic review. Korean J Fam Med. 2012;33(6):336–45.
3. Dinkler JM, Sugar CA, Escarce JJ, Ong MK, Mangione CM. Does Age Matter? Association between Usual source of Care and Hypertension Control in the US Population: Data from NHANES 2007–2012. Am J Hypertens. 2016;29(8):934–40.
4. Finney Rutten LJ, Agunwamba AA, Beckjord E, Hesse BW, Moser RP, Arora NK. The relation between having a Usual source of care and ratings of Care Quality: does patient-centered communication play a role? J Health Commun. 2015;20(7):759–65.
5. Phillips RL, Dodoo MS, Green LA, et al. Usual source of care: an important source of variation in health care spending. Health Aff. 2009;28(2):567–77.