Author:
Slawek Deepika E.,Althouse Andrew D.,Feldman Robert,Arnsten Julia H.,Bulls Hailey W.,Liebschutz Jane M.,Nugent Shannon M.,Orris Steven R.,Rohac Rebecca,Starrels Joanna L.,Morasco Benjamin J.,Kansagara Devan,Merlin Jessica S.
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Legal cannabis is available in more than half of the United States. Health care professionals (HCPs) rarely give recommendations on dosing or safety of cannabis due to limits imposed by policy and lack of knowledge. Customer-facing cannabis dispensary staff, including clinicians (pharmacists, nurses, physician’s assistants), communicate these recommendations in the absence of HCP recommendations. Little is known about how dispensary staff approach individuals with complex medical and psychiatric comorbidities. Using responses from a national survey, we describe how cannabis dispensary staff counsel customers with medical and psychiatric comorbidities on cannabis use and examine whether state-specific cannabis policy is associated with advice given to customers.
Methods
National, cross-sectional online survey study from February 13, 2020 to October 2, 2020 of dispensary staff at dispensaries that sell delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol containing products. Measures include responses to survey questions about how they approach customers with medical and psychiatric comorbidities; state medicalization score (scale 0-100; higher score indicates more similarity to regulation of traditional pharmacies); legalized adult-use cannabis (yes/no). We conducted multiple mixed effects multivariable logistic regression analyses to understand relationships between state medicalization and dispensary employees’ perspectives.
Results
Of 434 eligible respondents, most were budtenders (40%) or managers (32%), and a minority were clinicians (18%). State medicalization score was not associated with responses to most survey questions. It was associated with increased odds of encouraging customers with medical comorbidities to inform their traditional HCP of cannabis use (Odds ratio [OR]=1.2, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.0-1.4, p=0.03) and reduced odds of recommending cannabis for individuals with cannabis use disorder (CUD) (OR=0.8, 95% CI 0.7-1.0, p=0.04). Working in a state with legalized adult-use cannabis was associated with recommending traditional health care instead of cannabis in those with serious mental illness (OR 2.2, 95% CI 1.1-4.7, p=0.04). Less than half of respondents believed they had encountered CUD (49%), and over a quarter did not believe cannabis is addictive (26%).
Conclusions
When managing cannabis dosing and safety in customers with medical and psychiatric comorbidity, dispensary staff preferred involving individuals’ traditional HCPs. Dispensary staff were skeptical of cannabis being addictive. While state regulations of dispensaries may impact the products individuals have access to, they were not associated with recommendations that dispensary staff gave to customers. Alternative explanations for dispensary recommendations may include regional or store-level variation not captured in this analysis.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference39 articles.
1. Hartman M. Cannabis Overview. https://www.ncsl.org/research/civil-and-criminal-justice/marijuana-overview.aspx. Published 2021. Updated 4/8/2021. Accessed 4/26/2021, 2021.
2. Procon.org. Legal Recreational States and DC. https://marijuana.procon.org/legal-recreational-marijuana-states-and-dc/. Published 2021. Accessed 4/26/2021, 2021.
3. Procon.org. Legal Medical Marijuana States and DC. https://medicalmarijuana.procon.org/legal-medical-marijuana-states-and-dc/. Published 2021. Accessed 4/26/2021, 2021.
4. Bachhuber M, Arnsten JH, Wurm G. Use of cannabis to relieve pain and promote sleep by customers at an adult use dispensary. J Psychoactive Drugs. 2019;51(5):400–4.
5. Matson TE, Carrell DS, Bobb JF, et al. Prevalence of medical cannabis use and associated health conditions documented in electronic health records among primary care patients in Washington State. JAMA Netw Open. 2021;4(5):e219375. https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamanetworkopen/fullarticle/2792539.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献