Author:
Fadoul Yara,Haddad Chadia,Habib Jad,Zoghbi Marouan
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Drug promoting brochures can influence physicians prescription patterns. The validity of the info presented in these brochures is of major importance. World Health Organization (WHO) issued criteria to guarantee validity, equity and ethical presentation of data in medical brochures. This study aims to evaluate the quality and the validity of information presented in the pharmaceutical brochures distributed among family physicians in Lebanon.
Methods
Pharmaceutical brochures were randomly collected at the family medicine center in Hôtel Dieu de France hospital in Beirut - Lebanon. These brochures were evaluated in reference to the WHO ethical criteria for medicinal drug promotion and on guidelines for quality assurance of the graphs, references, texts and illustrations.
Results
Among the 60 brochures collected, only 4 fulfilled all the WHO ethical criteria, and 24 presented less than half the required criteria. Information concerning the drug safety are the least mentioned. Only 11.8% of the presented graphs are based on studies of high methodological level. Half of the brochures presented necessary information to identify studies references which are not always retrievable. Texts present mainly brand names instead of generic names and emphasize on information reflecting the drug efficacy.
Conclusion
The pharmaceutical brochures in this study presented incomplete or invalid information. Prescribing physicians should be aware of the claims found in the brochures distributed by pharmaceutical companies and should be familiar with the principles of the evidence-based medicine to be able to critically appraise the validity of the reference studies and avoid the pitfalls in graphs reading.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference46 articles.
1. WHO. Drug promotion : what we know, what we have yet to learn : reviews of materials in the WHO/HAI database on drug promotion / Pauline Norris … [et al.]. World Health Organization. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/69177. 2005.
2. Can the advertisements in a reputable medical journal promote quackery? JAMA. 1994;271(22):1720b-b.
3. Lexchin J. Interactions between physicians and the pharmaceutical industry: what does the literature say? CMAJ. Can Med Assoc J. 1993;149(10):1401.
4. WHO. Ethical criteria for medicinal drug promotion: World Health Organization. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/38125; 1988.
5. Cardarelli R, Licciardone JC, Taylor LG. A cross-sectional evidence-based review of pharmaceutical promotional marketing brochures and their underlying studies: is what they tell us important and true? BMC Fam Pract. 2006;7(1):1–6.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献