Abstract
Abstract
Background
Patient safety is defined as the prevention of harm to patients and aims to prevent errors. This analysis explores factors associated with the reported occurrence of patient safety incidents (PSIs) in general practices in Ireland at the start of the COVID-19 pandemic.
Methods
The PRICOV-19 was a cross-sectional study to record the (re)organisation of care provided in general practice and changes implemented during the COVID-19 pandemic in 38 countries. Primary outcomes include three potential scenarios of PSIs: delayed care due to practice factors, delayed care due to patient factors, and delayed care due to triage. Exploratory variables included demographic and organisational characteristics, triage, collaboration, and strategies to safeguard staff members’ well-being.
Results
Of the 172 participating Irish general practices, 71% (n = 122) recorded at least one potential PSI. The most frequent incident was delayed care due to patient factors (65%), followed by practice (33%) and triage (30%). Multivariate analysis showed that delayed care due to patient factors was associated with changes in the process of repeat prescriptions (OR 6.7 [CI 95% 2.5 to 19.6]). Delayed care due to practice factors was associated with suburbs/small towns (OR 4.2 [1.1 to 19.8]) and structural changes to the reception (OR 3.5 [1.2 to 11.4]). While delayed care due to patient factors was associated with having a practice population of 6000–7999 patients (OR 4.7 [1.1 to 27.6]) and delayed care due to practice factors was associated with having a practice population of 2000–3999 patients (OR 4.2 [1.2 to 17.1]). No linear associations were observed with higher or lower patient numbers for any factor. Delayed care due to triage was not associated with any exploratory variables.
Conclusion
The COVID-19 pandemic resulted in dramatic changes in the delivery of care through general practices in Ireland. Few factors were associated with the reported occurrence of PSIs, and these did not show consistent patterns. Sustained improvements were made in relation to repeat prescriptions. The lack of consistent patterns, potentially confirms that the autonomous decisions made in general practice in response to the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic could have benefitted patient safety (See Graphical abstract).
Graphical Abstract
Funder
Health Research Board, Ireland
European General Practice Research Network
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference33 articles.
1. Mitchell P. Chapter 1: Defining Patient Safety and Quality Care. In: Hughes RG, editor. Patient Safety and Quality: An Evidence-Based Handbook for Nurses. AHRQ Publication No. 08-0043, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, 1-5; 2008.
2. Carson-Stevens A, Donaldson L. Reporting and learning from patient safety incidents in general practice. London-UK: Royal College of General Practitioners; 2017.
3. Panagioti M, Stokes J, Esmail A, Coventry P, Cheraghi-Sohi S, Alam R, et al. Multimorbidity and patient safety incidents in primary care: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0135947.
4. Astier-Peña MP, Martínez-Bianchi V, Torijano-Casalengua ML, Ares-Blanco S, Bueno-Ortiz J-M, Férnandez-García M. The Global Patient Safety Action Plan 2021–2030: identifying actions for safer primary health care. Atención Primaria. 2021;53:102224.
5. Auraaen A, Slawomirski L, Klazinga N. The economics of patient safety in primary and ambulatory care. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1787/baf425ad-en. Accessed 23 June 2022.