Author:
Nishimura Masahiro,Teo Alan R.,Mochizuki Takahiro,Fujiwara Naoki,Nakamura Masakazu,Yamashita Daisuke
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Quality improvement (QI) initiatives in primary care in Japan are rare. One crucial area for QI is the appropriate prescription of benzodiazepines due to the large and growing elderly population in the country.
Objective
This study aimed to determine the feasibility and other perceptions of a Benzodiazepine receptor agonist medications (BZRAs) deprescribing QI initiative for primary care providers (PCPs) in Japanese primary care clinics.
Design
A qualitative study within a QI initiative.
Participants
We recruited 11 semi-public clinics and 13 providers in Japan to participate in a BZRAs deprescribing initiative from 2020 to 2021. After stratifying the clinics according to size, we randomly allocated implementation clinics to either an Audit only or an Audit plus Coaching group.
Interventions
For the Audit, we presented clinics with two BZRAs-related indicators. We provided monthly web-based meetings for the Coaching to support their QI activities.
Approach
After the nine-month initiative, we conducted semi-structured interviews and used content analysis to identify themes. We organized the themes and assessed the key factors of implementation using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) framework.
Key results
Audit plus Coaching was perceived as more valuable than Audit only intervention. Participants expressed intellectual curiosity about the QI initiative from resources outside their clinic. However, adopting a team-based QI approach in a small clinic was perceived as challenging, and selecting the indicators was important for meaningful QI.
Conclusion
The small size of the clinic could be a potential barrier, but enhancing academic curiosity may facilitate QI initiatives in primary care in Japan. Further implementation trials are needed to evaluate the possibility of QI with more various indicators and a more extended period of time.
Funder
Daido Life Welfare Foundation
Japan Association for Development of Community Medicine
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference33 articles.
1. Sakamoto H, Rahman M, Nomura S et al. Japan health system review. Health Systems in Transition, 8 (1), World Health Organization. Regional Office for South-East Asia.
2. Barber RM, Fullman N, Sorensen RJD, et al. Healthcare access and quality index based on mortality from causes amenable to personal health care in 195 countries and territories, 1990–2015: a novel analysis from the global burden of disease study 2015. Lancet. 2017;390(10091):231–66.
3. OECD. (2015). OECD Reviews of Health Care Quality: Japan 2015: Raising Standards. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264225817-en, Accessed February 16, 2020.
4. Japan Council for Quality Health Care Web site., Available at: https://jq-qiconf.jcqhc.or.jp/about-overview/, Accessed February 16, 2020.
5. Overview of Medical Facility Surveys and Hospital Reports. Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare. ; 2020. Available at : https://www.mhlw.go.jp/toukei/saikin/hw/iryosd/20/, Accessed February 16, 2020.