Author:
Mosler Franziska,Packer Katy,Jerome Lauren,Bird Victoria
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Majority of people with mental health problems attend primary care for support. Interventions that structure consultations have been found effective for physical health conditions and secondary mental health care. The aim of the review is to identify what tools or interventions exist to structure communication in primary care for appointments related to mental health problems and examine existing evidence for effectiveness for mental health and quality of life outcomes.
Methods
Quantitative and qualitative studies were eligible for inclusion if staff was based in a primary care setting and the intervention involved bi-directional communication with adult patients. Six databases were searched (MEDLINE, Web of Knowledge, EMBASE, PsycINFO, The Cochrane Library, CINAHL) with no time restriction. Search terms combined four concepts with key words such as “structured” and “interaction” and “mental illness” and “primary care”. Reference lists of eligible studies were searched.
Results
After removing duplicates, 3578 records were found and underwent further screening. A total of 16 records were included, representing eight different interventions from five countries. The majority were delivered by primary care doctors and focused on patients experiencing psychological distress. Similarities across interventions’ service delivery were that most were created for a broad patient population, used self-report assessments at the start and actions or plans as the end point, and employed group settings and didactic methods for training staff in the intervention. Booster and follow-up trainings were not offered in any of the interventions, and supervision was only part of the process for one. The evidence for effectiveness for mental health and quality of life outcomes was mixed with three out of five RCTs finding a positive effect.
Conclusions
Although the idea of structuring communication for mental health consultations has been around since the 1980s, relatively few interventions have attempted to structure the conversations within the consultation, rather than modifying pre-visit events. As the evidence-base showed feasibility and acceptability for a number of interventions, there is scope for those interventions to be developed further and tested more rigorously.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference53 articles.
1. Cooper LA, Ghods Dinoso BK, Ford DE, Roter DL, Primm AB, Larson SM, et al. Comparative effectiveness of standard versus patient-centered collaborative care interventions for depression among african americans in primary care settings: the BRIDGE Study. Health Serv Res. 2013;48(1):150. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3589960/. [Cited 2022 Apr 12].
2. Bernacki R, Hutchings M, Vick J, Smith G, Paladino J, Lipsitz S, et al. Development of the Serious Illness Care Program: a randomised controlled trial of a palliative care communication intervention. BMJ Open. 2015;5(10):e009032. Available from: https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/5/10/e009032. [Cited 2021 Jul 28].
3. Georgia AA, Swiderski D, Chuang EH, Flattau A, Stark A. This is hard work: Using a template for goals of care conversations at community health centres. J Gen Intern Med. 2020;35(Suppl 1):1. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7385936/. [Cited 2022 Mar 30].
4. Sviri S, Geva D, vanHeerden PV, Romain M, Rawhi H, Abutbul A, et al. Implementation of a structured communication tool improves family satisfaction and expectations in the intensive care unit. J Crit Care. 2019;51:6–12. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0883944118314382. [Cited 2019 Aug 27].
5. Parker D, Byng R, Dickens C, McCabe R. Patients’ Experiences of seeking help for psychological distress in primary care: doctor as drug, detective and collaborator. 2020. p. 1–11.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献