Implementation strategies for large scale quality improvement initiatives in primary care settings: a qualitative assessment

Author:

Goldberg Debora Goetz,Owens-Jasey Constance,Haghighat Sahar,Kavalloor Sneha

Abstract

Abstract Background and objectives The EvidenceNOW: Advancing Heart Health in Primary Care was designed to assist primary care practices in the US in implementing evidence-based practices in cardiovascular care and building capacity for quality improvement. EvidenceNOW, NCT03054090, was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov on 15/02/2017. The goals of this study were to gain a comprehensive understanding of perspectives from research participants and research team members on the value of implementation strategies and factors that influenced the EvidenceNOW initiative in Virginia. Methods In 2018, we conducted 25 focus groups with clinicians and staff at participating practices, including 80 physicians, advanced practice clinicians, practice managers and other practice staff. We also conducted face-to-face and telephone interviews with 22 research team members, including lead investigators, practice facilitators, physician expert consultants, and evaluators. We used the integrated-Promoting Action on Research Implementation in the Health Services (i-PARIHS) framework in our qualitative data analysis and organization of themes. Results Implementation strategies valued by both practice representatives and research team members included the kick-off event, on-site practice facilitation, and interaction with physician expert consultants. Remote practice facilitation and web-based tools were used less frequently. Contextual factors that influence quality improvement efforts include leadership support, access to resources, previous quality improvement experience, and practice ownership type (independent compared to health system owned). Many clinicians and staff were overwhelmed by day-to-day activities and experience initiative fatigue, which hindered their ability to fully participate in the EvidenceNOW initiative. Conclusions This study provides details on how the practice environment plays an essential role in the implementation of evidence-based practices in primary care. Future efforts to improve quality in primary care practices should consider the context and environment of individual practices, with targeted implementation strategies to meet the needs of independent and health system owned practices. Future efforts to improve quality in primary care practices require strategies to address initiative fatigue among clinicians and practice staff. External support for building capacity for quality improvement could help primary care practices implement and sustain evidence-based practices and improve quality of care. Trial registration This project was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov on 15/02/2017 and the identifier is NCT03054090.

Funder

US Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Family Practice

Reference34 articles.

1. US Department of Health and Human Services, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Improving primary care practice. 2019, Aug. Available from: https://www.ahrq.gov/ncepcr/tools/improve/index.html.

2. US Department of Health and Human Services, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. IMPaCT (Infrastructure for Maintaining Primary Care Transformation). 2012, Sept. Available from: https://www.ahrq.gov/research/findings/factsheets/primary/impactaw/index.html.

3. US Department of Health and Human Services, Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Transforming clinical practice initiative. 2021, May. Available from: https://innovation.cms.gov/innovation-models/transforming-clinical-practices.

4. The Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology (ONC). Regional Extension Centers (RECs). Washington, DC; HealthIT.gov. 2018, Nov. Available from: https://www.healthit.gov/topic/regional-extension-centers-recs.

5. Lynch K, Kendall M, Shanks K, Haque A, Jones E, Wanis MG, et al. The Health IT Regional Extension Center Program: evolution and lessons for health care transformation. Health Serv Res. 2014;49(1 Pt 2):421–37. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.12140.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3