Author:
Kaneko Makoto,Okada Tadao,Aoki Takuya,Inoue Machiko,Watanabe Takamasa,Kuroki Makoto,Hayashi Daichi,Matsushima Masato
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Although primary care (PC) is an indispensable part of the health system, measuring its quality is challenging. A recent measure of PC, Person-Centered Primary Care Measure (PCPCM), covers 11 important domains of PC and has been translated into 28 languages. This study aimed to develop a Japanese version of the PCPCM and assess its reliability and validity.
Methods
We employed a cross-sectional mail survey to examine the reliability and content, structure, criterion-related, and convergent validity of the Japanese version of the PCPCM. This study targeted 1000 potential participants aged 20–74 years, selected by simple random sampling in an urban area in Japan. We examined internal consistency, confirmatory factor analysis, correlation between the Japanese version of the Primary Care Assessment Tool-Short Form (JPCAT-SF), and the association between the PCPCM score and influenza vaccine uptake.
Results
A total of 417 individuals responded to the survey (response rate = 41.7%), and we used the data of 244 participants who had the usual source of care to assess the reliability and validity of the PCPCM. Confirmatory factor analysis demonstrated sufficient structural validity of the original one-factor structure. The overall Cronbach’s alpha was 0.94. The Spearman correlation coefficient between PCPCM and JPCAT-SF was 0.60. Influenza vaccine uptake was not significantly associated with total PCPCM score.
Conclusions
The study showed that the Japanese version of the PCPCM has sufficient internal consistency reliability and structural- and criterion-related validity. The measure can be used to compare the quality of primary care in Japan and other countries.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference36 articles.
1. Starfield B. New paradigms for quality in primary care. Br J Gen Pract. 2001;51:303–9.
2. Kringos DS, Boerma WGW, Hutchinson A, Saltman RB, editors. Building primary care in a changing Europe. Copenhagen: European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies; 2015.
3. Kringos D, Boerma W, Bourgueil Y, Cartier T, Dedeu T, Hasvold T, et al. The strength of primary care in Europe: an international comparative study. Br J Gen Pract. 2013;63:e742–50.
4. Kringos DS, Boerma WGW, Hutchinson A, van der Zee J, Groenewegen PP. The breadth of primary care: a systematic literature review of its core dimensions. BMC Health Serv Res. 2010;10:65.
5. Olde Hartman TC, Bazemore A, Etz R, Kassai R, Kidd M, Phillips RL Jr, et al. Developing measures to capture the true value of primary care. BJGP Open. 2021;5:BJGPO.2020.0152.
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献