Patient perceptions and experiences of medication review: qualitative study in general practice

Author:

McCahon Deborah,Duncan Polly,Payne Rupert,Horwood Jeremy

Abstract

Abstract Background Clinical medication reviews are a recognised strategy to address polypharmacy, a key part of general practice and positively associated with patient safety and clinical effectiveness. To date there has been little investigation of the patient perspective of medication reviews. Objective To explore patient experiences of medication review including the processes and activities that led up to and shaped the review. Methods Qualitative interview study within 10 general practices in Bristol. Participants were adults with polypharmacy (≥ 4 medications) and ≥ 2 long-term conditions who had a record of medication review with either a GP or pharmacist. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and analysed thematically using a data driven approach. Co-design work was undertaken with four patient and public involvement advisers to design and develop resources to support patient preparation for medication review. Results Twenty-one patients were interviewed (10 female, mean age 73 years, range 59–88 years). Medication review was viewed as an opportunity to assess the effectiveness and need for medications. Participants expected the review to focus upon medication related concerns, side-effects and symptoms. Those who were newer to review, were uncertain of the intended purpose, and described their review as a box-ticking exercise. Some participants were unfamiliar with the role of the pharmacist and expressed a lack of confidence in their clinical skills and knowledge. Face-to-face consultation and relationship continuity were considered important for efficient and effective medication review. Results informed co-production of a patient information leaflet to facilitate greater patient engagement and involvement in medication review. Conclusions A lack of understanding of the rationale for medication review can limit the value patients attach to these healthcare encounters. Improved prior communication and information around the intended purpose and potential benefits of medication review may enhance patient engagement and improve patient experience and outcomes.

Funder

Scientific Foundation Board of the Royal College of General Practitioners

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Family Practice

Reference30 articles.

1. Heaton J, Britten N, Krska J, Reeve J. Person-centred medicines optimisation policy in England: An agenda for research on polypharmacy. Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2017;18(1):24–34. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1463423616000207.

2. Duerden, M., Avery,T., Payne, R. 2013: Polypharmacy and medicines optimisation. Kingsfund. Available at https://www.kingsfund.org.uk/sites/default/files/field/field_publication_file/polypharmacy-and-medicines-optimisation-kingsfund-nov13.pdf (Accessed Oct 2022)

3. Clyne, W., Blenkinsopp, A., Seaal R. 2008: A guide to medication review. Keele University, NPC Plus and Medicines Partnership. Available at agtmr_web.pdf (sefap.org) (Accessed Oct 2022)

4. NICE. 2015: Medicines Optimisation: the safe and effective use of medicines to enable the best possible outcomes. Available at https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng5 (Accessed Oct 2022)

5. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Quality and Outcomes Framework indictor. Quality and Outcomes Framework Indicators | Standards & Indicators | NICE (Accessed Oct 2022)

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3