Abstract
Abstract
Background
With increases in the use of technological devices worldwide, parental technoference is a potential threat to the quality of parent-child relationships and children’s health and development. Parental technoference refers to disrupted interactions between a parent and child due to a parent’s use of a technological device. The aims of this scoping review are to map, describe, and summarize the existing evidence from published research studies on the impacts of parental technoference on parent-child relationships and children’s health and development and to identify the limitations in the studies and gaps in the literature.
Methods
This scoping review will be conducted in accordance with the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) methodology. A search for relevant research studies will be undertaken in APA PsycInfo, MEDLINE, Central, Cochrane Database for Systematic Reviews, JBI EBP, and Embase (OVID). CINAHL (Ebsco) and Scopus will also be searched. Grey and popular literature will be excluded. This review will include primary research studies and review papers published in English with no time limit that identify the impacts of technoference on parent-child relationships and child health and developmental outcomes. Parent participants include primary caregivers, either biological, adopted, or foster parents, of children under the age of 18 who engage in technoference. Two reviewers will independently screen the titles, abstracts, and full texts of studies according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Disagreements will be resolved through discussion with a third researcher. Data will be extracted into a data charting table including author(s), year of publication, country, research aim, methodology/design, population and sample size, variables/concepts, and corresponding measures and main results. Data will be presented in tables and figures accompanied by a narrative summary.
Discussion
The goal of this scoping review is to present an overview of the evidence on the impacts of parental technoference on parent-child relationships and child and health developmental outcomes, highlighting the current risk of children of today. It will identify gaps in the literature, inform future research, advise recommendations for parents on technological device use, and possibly guide the development of interventions aimed at addressing parental technoference.
Trial registration
Open Science Framework 10.17605/OSF.IO/QNTS5
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference43 articles.
1. The Canadian Radio-Television and Telecommunications Commision. Communications monitoring report 2018. [Internet]. 2019 [cited 2021 March 10]. Available from: https://crtc.gc.ca/pubs/cmr2018-en.pdf.
2. Pew Research Center. Mobile fact sheet [Internet]. 2019 [cited 2021 March 10]. Available from: https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/fact-sheet/mobile/.
3. Rainie L, Zickuhr K. Americans' views on mobile etiquette. Pew Research Center. 2015 [cited 2021 March 10]. Available from: http://www.pewinternet.org/2015/08/26/americans-views-on-mobile-etiquette/.
4. GSMA Association. The mobile economy Europe 2021 [Internet]. 2021 [cited 2021 March 12]. Available from:
https://www.gsma.com/mobileeconomy/europe/.
5. GeoPoll. Mobile penetration in South Asia and Southeast Asia [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2021 March 12]. Available from: https://www.geopoll.com/blog/mobile-penetration-asia-south-asia-southeast-asia/.
Cited by
12 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献