Abstract
Abstract
Background
This systematic review was conducted to inform the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care recommendations on screening for thyroid dysfunction (TD). The review sought to answer key questions on the benefits and harms of screening for TD, patients’ values and preferences for screening, and the benefits and harms of treating screen-detected TD.
Methods
This review followed Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care methods, which include the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. The search strategy used for benefits and harms of screening and treatment was an update to the 2014 review by the US Preventive Services Task Force and searched MEDLINE and the Cochrane Library. MEDLINE, Embase, ProQuest Public Health, and SCOPUS were searched for patients’ values and preferences for screening. Outcomes of interest included all-cause mortality, deaths due to cardiovascular diseases, fatal and non-fatal cardiovascular events, atrial fibrillation, fractures, quality of life, cognitive function, and harms due to TD treatment. Two reviewers independently screened abstracts and full texts according to pre-determined inclusion criteria and assessed the risk of bias for each study included. Strength and quality of the evidence was assessed for each outcome. A narrative synthesis was conducted due to heterogeneity of the included studies.
Results
No studies were found on screening for TD, treatment of subclinical hyperthyroidism, or patients’ values and preferences for screening for TD. Twenty-two studies (from 24 publications) on the treatment of TD in patients with screen-detected subclinical hypothyroidism were included. Results from the included randomized controlled trials suggested no benefit of treatment for subclinical hypothyroidism for the large majority of outcomes. We found very low-quality evidence (from two cohort studies) for a small reduction in all-cause mortality among adults < 65 or 40–70 years who were treated for TD compared to those who were not.
Conclusions
This review found moderate to very low-quality evidence on the benefits and harms of treatment for subclinical hypothyroidism, with most of the evidence showing no benefit of treatment.
Funder
Public Health Agency of Canada
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference90 articles.
1. Gaitonde DY, Rowley KD, Sweeney LB. Hypothyroidism: an update. Am Fam Physician. 2012;86(3):244–51.
2. Kravets I. Hyperthyroidism: diagnosis and treatment. Am Fam Physician. 2016;93(5):363–70.
3. Chaker L, Bianco AC, Jonklaas J, Peeters RP. Hypothyroidism. Lancet. 2017;390(10101):1550–62.
4. Gillett M. Subclinical hypothyroidism: subclinical thyroid disease: scientific review and guidelines for diagnosis and management. Clin Biochem Rev. 2004;25(3):191–4.
5. LeFevre ML, Siu AL, Bibbins-Domingo K, et al. Screening for thyroid dysfunction: U.S. preventive services task force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med. 2015;162(9):641–50 Accessed 10 May 2017.
Cited by
11 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献