Abstract
Abstract
Background
Several information and communication technologies (ICT) have been developed to enhance social connectedness of older adults aging in place, although they are not accessible for all. Barriers in using ICT might for example relate to health issues, sensory loss, lack of technical skills, or reluctance to use technologies. Though knowledge on these barriers is crucial for the development and implementation of ICT for older adults, no systematic review was found on this subject. The proposed qualitative systematic review aims to explore barriers experienced by older adults aging in place in using ICT for social interaction.
Methods
The review will be conducted in accordance with the JBI methodology. Databases for search will include MEDLINE (via PubMed), CINAHL (via EBSCO), and Web of Science (ISI), among others. Included studies focus on older adults ageing in place 60 years or older. Pairs of authors will independently, by following agreed guidelines, assess the eligibility of studies, and extract data. The testing of eligibility criteria and screening of titles, abstracts, and full texts will be performed. The findings will describe for example populations, context, culture, and the phenomena of interest. Qualitative research findings will, where possible, be pooled by using JBI SUMARI for the meta-aggregation approach.
Discussion
The mapping of published studies has the potential to identify research gaps in the existing literature, which again may inform developers and stakeholders in designing more user-friendly and adaptive ICT solutions for older people ageing in place.
Systematic review registration
CRD42022370044.
Funder
European Cooperation in Science and Technology
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference39 articles.
1. Pani-Harreman KE, Bours GJJW, Zander I, Kempen GIJM, van Duren JMA. Definitions, key themes and aspects of ‘ageing in place’: a scoping review. Ageing Soc. 2021;41(9):2026–59.
2. Prevention CfDCa. Healthy Places Terminology Atlanta: U.S. Department of Health & Human Services; 2013 [Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/healthyplaces/terminology.htm.
3. Forsyth A, Molinsky J. What is aging in place? Confusions and contradictions. Housing Policy Debate. 2021;31(2):181–96.
4. Davey J. “Ageing in place”: the views of older homeowners about housing maintenance, renovation and adaptation. Wellington, New Zealand: Ministry of Social Development, Centre for Social Research and Evaluation; 2006.
5. Vasunilashorn S, Steinman BA, Liebig PS, Pynoos J. Aging in place: evolution of a research topic whose time has come. J Aging Res. 2012;2012:120952.