Author:
Palazón-Llecha Alba,Caparrós Beatriz,Trujols Joan,Duran-Sindreu Santiago,Batlle Francesca,Madre Mercè,Mallorquí-Bagué Núria
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Psychosocial approaches are the first-line treatments for cocaine dependence, although they still present high dropout and relapse rates. Thus, there is a pressing need to understand which variables influence treatment outcomes to improve current treatments and prevent dropout and relapse rates. The aim of this study is to explore predictors of treatment retention and abstinence in CUD.
Methods
This systematic review was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). We searched three databases—PubMed, PsychINFO and Web of Science—for randomized clinical trials (RCTs) published in English and Spanish from database inception through April 1, 2023. We selected all studies that met the inclusion criteria (adults aged ≥ 18, outpatient treatment, CUD as main addiction, and no severe mental illness) to obtain data for the narrative synthesis addressing cocaine abstinence and treatment retention as main outcome variables. After data extraction was completed, risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials (RoB-2).
Results
A total of 566 studies were screened, and, of those, 32 RCTs were included in the synthesis. Younger age, more years of cocaine use, and craving levels were significant predictors of relapse and treatment dropout. Fewer withdrawal symptoms, greater baseline abstinence, greater treatment engagement, and more self-efficacy were all predictors of longer duration of abstinence. The role of impulsivity as a predictor of CUD is unclear due to conflicting data, although the evidence generally suggests that higher impulsivity scores can predict more severe addiction and withdrawal symptoms, and earlier discontinuation of treatment.
Conclusion
Current evidence indicates which variables have a direct influence on treatment outcomes, including well-studied cocaine use-related variables. However, additional variables, such as genetic markers, appear to have a high impact on treatment outcomes and need further study.
Systematic review registration
This systematic review is registered at PROSPERO (ID: CRD42021271847). This study was funded by the Spanish Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities, Instituto Carlos III (ISCIII) (FIS PI20/00929) and FEDER funds and Fundació Privada Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau (Pla d’acció social 2020).
Funder
Instituto de Salud Carlos III
Fondo Europeo de Desarrollo Regional
Fundació Privada Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference47 articles.
1. European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction. European Drug Report 2021: Trends and Developments. Off. Eur. Union, Luxemb. 2021. https://www.emcdda.europa.eu/publications/edr/trends-developments/2021_en. Accessed 2 May 2022.
2. Clinical Guidelines on Drug Misuse and Dependence Update 2017 Independent Expert Working Group. Drug Misuse and Dependence: UK guidelines on clinical management. Department of Health. 2017. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/drug-misuse-and-dependence-uk-guidelines-on-clinical-management. Accessed 16 Apr 2022.
3. Petitjean SA, Dürsteler-MacFarland KM, Krokar MC, Strasser J, Mueller SE, Degen B, et al. A randomized, controlled trial of combined cognitive-behavioral therapy plus prize-based contingency management for cocaine dependence. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2014.09.785.
4. World Health Organization & United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. International standards for the treatment of drug use disorders: revised edition incorporating results of field-testing. 2020.
5. Bentzley BS, Han SS, Neuner S, Humphreys K, Kampman KM, Halpern CH. Comparison of treatments for cocaine use disorder among adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Netw Open. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.8049.