Screening for prostate cancer: protocol for updating multiple systematic reviews to inform a Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care guideline update

Author:

Bennett AlexandriaORCID,Beck AndrewORCID,Shaver Nicole,Grad Roland,LeBlanc Allana,Limburg Heather,Gray Casey,Abou-Setta Ahmed,Klarenbach Scott,Persaud Navindra,Thériault Guylène,Thombs Brett D.,Todd Keith J.,Bell Neil,Dahm Philipp,Loblaw Andrew,Del Giudice Lisa,Yao Xiaomei,Skidmore Becky,Rolland-Harris Elizabeth,Brouwers Melissa,Little Julian,Moher DavidORCID

Abstract

Abstract Purpose To inform updated recommendations by the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care on screening for prostate cancer in adults aged 18 years and older in primary care. This protocol outlines the planned scope and methods for a series of systematic reviews. Methods Updates of two systematic reviews and a de novo review will be conducted to synthesize the evidence on the benefits and harms of screening for prostate cancer with a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and/or digital rectal examination (DRE) (with or without additional information) and patient values and preferences. Outcomes for the benefits of screening include reduced prostate cancer mortality, all-cause mortality, and incidence of metastatic prostate cancer. Outcomes for the harms of screening include false-positive screening tests, overdiagnosis, complications due to biopsy, and complications of treatment including incontinence (urinary or bowel), and erectile dysfunction. The quality of life or functioning (overall and disease-specific) and psychological effects outcomes are considered as a possible benefit or harm. Outcomes for the values and preferences review include quantitative or qualitative information regarding the choice to screen or intention to undergo screening. For the reviews on benefits or harms, we will search for randomized controlled trials, quasi-randomized, and controlled studies in MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. For the review on values and preferences, we will search for experimental or observational studies in MEDLINE, Embase, and PsycInfo. For all reviews, we will also search websites of relevant organizations, gray literature, and reference lists of included studies. Title and abstract screening, full-text review, data extraction, and risk of bias assessments will be completed independently by pairs of reviewers with any disagreements resolved by consensus or by consulting with a third reviewer. The GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) approach will be used to assess the certainty of the evidence for each outcome. Discussion The series of systematic reviews will be used by the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care to update their 2014 guideline on screening for prostate cancer in adults aged 18 years and older. Systematic review registration This review has been registered with PROSPERO (CRD42022314407) and is available on the Open Science Framework (osf.io/dm32k).

Funder

Public Health Agency of Canada

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Medicine (miscellaneous)

Reference129 articles.

1. Bell N, Gorber SC, Shane A, Joffres M, Singh H, Dickinson J, et al. Recommendations on screening for prostate cancer with the prostate-specific antigen test. CMAJ. 2014;186:1225–34.

2. What is prostate cancer? Canadian Cancer Society. Available from: https://www.cancer.ca/en/cancer-information/cancer-type/prostate/prostate-cancer/?region=on. Accessed 30 Mar 2021.

3. TNM staging for prostate cancer. Cancer Research UK. 2019. Available from:   https://www.cancerresearchuk.org/about-cancer/prostate-cancer/stages/tnm-staging. Accessed 30 Mar 2021.

4. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology Prostate Cancer. NCCN Guidelines. 2017. Available from: https://www.nccn.org/patientresources/patient-resources. Accessed 17 Feb 2021.

5. Canadian Cancer Statistics Advisory Committee. Canadian Cancer Statistics 2019. Toronto: Canadian Cancer Society; 2019. Available from: Cancer.ca/Canadian-Cancer-Statistics-2019-EN. Accessed 27 Feb 2020.

Cited by 6 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3