Abstract
AbstractHome birth is experienced by people very differently worldwide. These experiences likely differ by the type of stakeholder involved (women, their support persons, birth attendants, policy-makers), the experience itself (low-risk birth, transfer to hospital, previous deliveries), and by the health system within which home birth occurs (e.g., high-resource versus low- and middle-resource countries). Research evidence of stakeholders’ perspectives of home birth could usefully inform personal and policy decisions about choosing and providing home birth, but the current literature is fragmented and its breadth is not fully understood.We conducted a systematic scoping review to understand how the research literature on stakeholders’ perspectives of home birth is characterized in terms of populations, settings and identified issues, and what potential gaps exist in the research evidence. A range of electronic, web-based and key informant sources of evidence were searched. Located references were assessed, data extracted, and descriptively analyzed using robust methods.Our analysis included 460 full reports. Findings from 210 reports of studies in high-resource countries suggested that research with fathers and same-sex partners, midwives, and vulnerable populations and perspectives of freebirth and transfer to hospital could be synthesized. Gaps in primary research exist with respect to family members, policy makers, and those living in rural and remote locations. A further 250 reports of studies in low- and middle-resource countries suggested evidence for syntheses related to fathers and other family members, policy makers, and other health care providers and examination of issues related to emergency transfer to hospital, rural and remote home birth, and those who birth out of hospital, often at home, despite receiving antenatal care intended to increase healthcare-seeking behavior. Gaps in primary research suggest an examination is needed of perspectives in countries with higher maternal mortality and among first-time mothers and young mothers.Our scoping review identified a considerable body of research evidence on stakeholder perspectives of home birth. These could inform the complex factors influencing personal decisions and health system planning around home birth in both high- and low- and middle-resource countries. Future primary research is warranted on specific stakeholders worldwide and with vulnerable populations in areas of high maternal mortality.
Funder
Institute of Population and Public Health
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference98 articles.
1. Bassey Etowa J. Becoming a mother: the meaning of childbirth for African–Canadian women. Contemp Nurse. 2012;41(1):28–40.
2. Luyben AG, Kinn SR, Fleming VE. Becoming a mother: women’s journeys from expectation to experience in three european countries. Int J Childbirth. 2011;1(1):13–26.
3. Oakley A. From here to maternity (reissue): becoming a mother. Bristol University Press; 2018. https://policy.bristoluniversitypress.co.uk/home.
4. Public Health Agency of Canada. Family-centred maternity and newborn care: national guidelines. Ottawa: Public Health Agency of Canada; 2019.
5. (NICE) NIfHaCE. Intrapartum care for healthy women and babies: clinical guideline. London: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE); 2017. p. 90.
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献