Abstract
Abstract
Background
Health systems are often fragmented in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). This can increase inefficiencies and restrict progress towards universal health coverage. The objective of the systematic review described in this protocol will be to evaluate and synthesize the evidence concerning the impacts of health systems financing fragmentation in LMICs.
Methods
Literature searches will be conducted in multiple electronic databases, from their inception onwards, including MEDLINE, EMBASE, LILACS, CINAHL, Scopus, ScienceDirect, Scielo, Cochrane Library, EconLit, and JSTOR. Gray literature will be also targeted through searching OpenSIGLE, Google Scholar, and institutional websites (e.g., HMIC, The World Bank, WHO, PAHO, OECD). The search strings will include keywords related to LMICs, health system financing fragmentation, and health system goals. Experimental, quasi-experimental, and observational studies conducted in LMICs and examining health financing fragmentation across any relevant metric (e.g., the presence of different health funders/insurers, risk pooling mechanisms, eligibility categories, benefits packages, premiums) will be included. Studies will be eligible if they compare financing fragmentation in alternative settings or at least two-time points. The primary outcomes will be health system-related goals such as health outcomes (e.g., mortality, morbidity, patient-reported outcome measures) and indicators of access, services utilization, equity, and financial risk protection. Additional outcomes will include intermediate health system objectives (e.g., indicators of efficiency and quality). Two reviewers will independently screen all citations, abstract data, and full-text articles. Potential conflicts will be resolved through discussion and, when necessary, resolved by a third reviewer. The methodological quality (or risk of bias) of selected studies will be appraised using established checklists. Data extraction categories will include the studies’ objective and design, the fragmentation measurement and domains, and health outcomes linked to the fragmentation. A narrative synthesis will be used to describe the results and characteristics of all included studies and to explore relationships and findings both within and between the studies.
Discussion
Evidence on the impacts of health system fragmentation in LMICs is key for identifying evidence gaps and priority areas for intervention. This knowledge will be valuable to health system policymakers aiming to strengthen health systems in LMICs.
Systematic review registration
PROSPERO CRD42020201467
Funder
National Institute for Health Research
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference54 articles.
1. Bossert T, Blanchet N, Sheetz S, Pinto D, Cali J, Cuevas RP. Comparative review of health system integration in selected countries in Latin America. Technical Note no. 585. Washington, DC: Inter-American Development Bank; 2014. https://publications.iadb.org/en/publication/11898/comparative-review-health-system-integration-selected-countries-latin-america. Accessed 7 Jul 2020
2. Lewis RQ. Nuffield Trust for Research and Policy Studies in Health Services, King Edward’s Hospital Fund for London. Where next for integrated care organisations in the English NHS? London: The Nuffield Trust; 2010.
3. Wallace C. An exploration of health and social care service integration in a deprived South Wales Area [Thesis] Coventry, Eng.: Coventry University in collaboration with the University of Worcester; 2009. https://core.ac.uk/reader/1914778. Accessed 7 Jul 2020.
4. Contandriopoulos A-P, santé U de MG de recherche interdisciplinaire en. The integration of health care: dimensions and implementation: working paper. GRIS, Université de Montréal; 2004. 27 p.
5. Greer SL, Méndez CA. Universal health coverage: a political struggle and governance challenge. Am J Public Health. 2015;105(5):S637–9. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2015.302733.