Author:
Roudini Juliet,Weschke Sarah,Rackoll Torsten,Dirnagl Ulrich,Guyatt Gordon,Khankeh Hamidreza
Abstract
AbstractThis protocol describes a systematic scoping review of Stroke Patient and Stakeholder Engagement (SPSE), concepts, definitions, models, implementation strategies, indicators, or frameworks. The active engagement of patients and other stakeholders is increasingly acknowledged as essential to patient-centered research to answer questions of importance to patients and their caregivers. Stroke is a debilitating, long-lasting burden for individuals, their families, and healthcare professionals. They require rehabilitation services, health care system assistance, and social support. Their difficulties are unique and require the continued involvement of all parties involved. Understanding SPSE in research is fundamental to healthcare planning and extends the role of patients and stakeholders beyond that of the study subject. We will conduct a systematic literature search to identify the types of existing evidence related to SPSE, implementation strategies, indicators, or frameworks related to Patient and Stakeholder Engagement (PSE); clarify key concepts, definitions, and components of SPSE; compile experiences and prerequisites; and identify stroke research internationally. Two independent reviewers will extract data from selected studies onto a customized extraction form that has already been piloted. We integrate existing knowledge to address gaps in the literature on SPSE research by presenting the model, implementation strategies, indicators, and frameworks for stroke patients. We hope that these findings will offer future researchers a clear picture and conceptual model of SPSE.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference33 articles.
1. Harrington RL, Hanna ML, Oehrlein EM, Camp R, Wheeler R, Cooblall C, Tesoro T, Scott AM, von Gizycki R, Nguyen F, Hareendran A, Patrick DL, Perfetto EM. Defining patient engagement in research: results of a systematic review and analysis: report of the ISPOR patient-centered special interest group. Value Health. 2020;23(6):677–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JVAL.2020.01.019.
2. Carman KL, Dardess P, Maurer M, Sofaer S, Adams K, Bechtel C, Sweeney J. Patient and family engagement: a framework for understanding the elements and developing interventions and policies. Health Aff. 2013;32(2):223–31. https://doi.org/10.1377/HLTHAFF.2012.1133.
3. Hickam D, Totten A, Berg A, Rader K, Goodman S, Anise A, Johnson E, Meisel Z, Reid E, Saxton L. The PCORI methodology report. Pcori.Com. Retrieved Aug 1, 2022 from https://www.pcori.com/assets/2013/11/PCORI-Board-Meeting-Methodology-Report-for-Acceptance-1118131.pdf.
4. Shippee ND, Domecq Garces JP, Prutsky Lopez GJ, Wang Z, Elraiyah TA, Nabhan M, Brito JP, Boehmer K, Hasan R, Firwana B, Erwin PJ, Montori VM, Murad MH. Patient and service user engagement in research: a systematic review and synthesized framework. Health Expect. 2015;18(5):1151–66. https://doi.org/10.1111/HEX.12090.
5. Watson V, Carnon A, Ryan M, Cox D. 2012. Involving the public in priority setting: a case study using discrete choice experiments. Academic.Oup.Com. Retrieved Aug 1, 2022, from https://academic.oup.com/jpubhealth/article-abstract/34/2/253/1549301.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献