Abstract
Abstract
Background
The raccoon (Procyon lotor) is an invasive, non-native species in Japan. Throughout the country, it causes significant agricultural damage and negatively affects native biodiversity. Most of the responsibility for raccoon management lies with local government, and there are still many challenges to be overcome. Although raccoon populations have not been eradicated, intensive control campaigns such as focus on the early stages of invasion have controlled raccoons in some regions. To improve the national management of raccoons, we conducted a survey on raccoon management systems in local government departments considered to solve the challenges recognized in many areas. During 2014 and 2015, we surveyed three different municipal departments about raccoon management measures. The semi-structured interview survey covered two topics: (1) the situation leading up to the current management system; (2) the current management system.
Results
Our results describe the scope and methods used in raccoon management. The government staff managed raccoons using monitoring, employing a variety of methods, a range of budgets, and various role divisions. The management practices are similar in that they share a sense of taking precautions, collaborating with stakeholders, understanding that adequate methods must be used, and obtaining support from experts.
Conclusions
Our case studies reveal the challenges in raccoon management faced by local government officers in regions with active control. The management systems and methods that we surveyed seemed to be effective in solving problems in both developed and undeveloped areas.
Funder
the Environment Research and Technology Development Fund
the Sasakawa Scientific Research Grant from The Japan Science Society
JSPS and MBIE-RSNZ Joint Research Project under the Japan
JSPS KAKENHI
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Environmental Science,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
Reference59 articles.
1. Courchamp F, Fournier A, Bellard C, Bertelsmeier C, Bonnaud E, Jeschke JM, Russell JC. Invasion biology: specific problems and possible solutions. Trends Ecol Evol. 2017;32(1):13–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2016.11.001.
2. Doherty TS, Glen AS, Nimmo DG, Ritchie EG, Dickman CR. Invasive predators and global biodiversity loss. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2016;113(40):11261–5. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1602480113.
3. Holmes ND, Spatz DR, Oppel S, Tershy B, Croll DA, Keitt B, et al. Globally important islands where eradicating invasive mammals will benefit highly threatened vertebrates. PLoS ONE. 2019;14(3):e0212128. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0212128.
4. Ssc IUCN. IUCN guidelines for the prevention of biodiversity loss caused by alien invasive species. Auckland: IUCN, Species Survival Commission, Invasive Species Specialist Group; 2000.
5. Lockwood JL, Hoopes MF, Marchetti MP. Invasion ecology. West Sussex: Wiley; 2013.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献