Integrating simulation training during clinical practice in nursing homes: an experimental study of nursing students’ knowledge acquisition, self-efficacy and learning needs

Author:

Olaussen Camilla,Steindal Simen A.,Jelsness-Jørgensen Lars-Petter,Aase Ingunn,Stenseth Hege Vistven,Tvedt Christine Raaen

Abstract

Abstract Background Limited access to supervision, feedback and quality learning experiences pose challenges to learning in the clinical setting for first-year nursing students who are beginning their clinical experiences. Prior studies have indicated that simulation training, as a partial replacement of clinical practice hours, may improve learning. However, there has been little research on simulation training integrated as a partial replacement during first-year students’ clinical practice in nursing homes. The primary aim of this study was to examine first-year nursing students’ knowledge acquisition and self-efficacy in integrating a partial replacement of clinical hours in nursing homes with simulation training. Its secondary aim was to examine perceptions of how learning needs were met in the simulated environment compared with the clinical environment. Design The primary aim was addressed using an experimental design that included pre- and post-tests. The secondary aim was investigated using a descriptive survey-based comparison. Methods First-year students at a Norwegian university college (n = 116) were asked to participate. Those who agreed (n = 103) were randomly assigned to the intervention group (n = 52) or the control group (n = 51). A knowledge test, the General Self-efficacy Scale and the Clinical Learning Environment Comparison Survey were used to measure students’ outcomes and perceptions. The data were analysed using independent samples t-tests, chi-square tests and paired samples t-tests. Results Knowledge scores from pre- to post-tests were significantly higher in the intervention group than in the control group with a medium to large effect size (p < 0.01, Hedges’ g = 0.6). No significant differences in self-efficacy were identified. Significant differences (p <  0.05) were observed between the simulated and the clinical environment with regard to meeting learning needs; effect sizes ranged from small and medium to large (Cohen’s d from 0.3 to 1.0). Conclusion Integrating the partial replacement of clinical hours in nursing homes with simulation training for first-year nursing students was positively associated with knowledge acquisition and meeting learning needs. These findings are promising with regard to simulation as a viable partial replacement for traditional clinical practice in nursing homes to improve learning.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

General Nursing

Reference54 articles.

1. Report No.47 to the Storting. The coordination reform: proper treatment - at the right place at the right time. Report No 47 to the Storting. Norwegian Ministry of Health and Care Services. Available from: https://www.regjeringen.no/contentassets/d4f0e16ad32e4bbd8d8ab5c21445a5dc/en-gb/pdfs/stm200820090047000en_pdfs.pdf. 2008-2009.

2. Ringard Å, Sagan A, Saunes IS, Lindahl AK. Norway: health system review. Health System Transit. 2013;15(8):1–162 World health organization. Regional Office for Europe Available from: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/331786/HiT-22-1-2020-eng.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y.

3. Etherton-Beer C, Venturato L, Horner B. Organisational culture in residential aged care facilities: a cross-sectional observational study. PLoS One. 2013;8(3):e58002. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0058002.

4. Killett A, Hyde P, Burns D, Gray R, Poland F. How organizational factors interact to influence the quality of care of older people in the care home sector. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2013;18(1 Suppl):14–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/1355819613476016.

5. World Health Organization. Education and training: Technical Series on Safer Primary Care. Geneva: Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO; 2016. Available from: http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/252271/9789241511605-eng.pdf;jsessionid=FD0CFCA93653C2B89C551E5A4E68E8BA?sequence=1

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3