Author:
Ho Kuei-Fang,Chou Po-Hsiang,Chung Min-Huey
Abstract
Abstract
Background
The most suitable and reliable inference engines for Clinical Decision Support Systems in nursing clinical practice have rarely been explored.
Purpose
This study examined the effect of Clinical Diagnostic Validity-based and Bayesian Decision-based Knowledge-Based Clinical Decision Support Systems on the diagnostic accuracy of nursing students during psychiatric or mental health nursing practicums.
Methods
A single-blinded, non-equivalent control group pretest–posttest design was adopted. The participants were 607 nursing students. In the quasi-experimental design, two intervention groups used either a Knowledge-Based Clinical Decision Support System with the Clinical Diagnostic Validity or a Knowledge-Based Clinical Decision Support System with the Bayesian Decision inference engine to complete their practicum tasks. Additionally, a control group used the psychiatric care planning system without guidance indicators to support their decision-making. SPSS, version 20.0 (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA) was used for data analysis. chi-square (χ2) test and one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) used for categorical and continuous variables, respectively. Analysis of covariance was done to examine the PPV and sensitivity in the three groups.
Results
Results for the positive predictive value and sensitivity variables indicated that decision-making competency was highest in the Clinical Diagnostic Validity group, followed by the Bayesian and control groups. The Clinical Diagnostic Validity and Bayesian Decision groups significantly outperformed the control group in terms of scores on a 3Q model questionnaire and the modified Technology Acceptance Model 3. In terms of perceived usefulness and behavioral intention, the Clinical Diagnostic Validity group had significantly higher 3Q model and modified Technology Acceptance Model 3 scores than the Bayesian Decision group, which had significantly higher scores than the control group.
Conclusion
Knowledge-Based Clinical Decision Support Systems can be adopted to provide patient-oriented information and assist nursing student in the rapid management of patient information and formulation of patient-centered care plans.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference87 articles.
1. The Nursing Process [http://www.nursingworld.org/practice-policy/workforce/what-is-nursing/the-nursing-process/].
2. Averill CB, Marek KD, Zielstorff R, Kneedler J, Delaney C, Milholland DK. ANA standards for nursing data sets in information systems. Comput Nurs. 1998;16(3):157–61.
3. Simpson RL. ICNP: The language of worldwide nursing. Nurs Manag. 2007;38(2):15, 18.
4. Hao ATH, Wu LP, Kumar A, Jian WS, Huang LF, Kao CC, Hsu CY. Nursing process decision support system for urology ward. Int J Med Inform. 2013;82(7):604–12.
5. Rutherford M. Standardized nursing language: what does it mean for nursing practice. OJIN. 2008;13(1):243–50.
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献