Turkish psychometric characteristics of the humanistic practice ability of nursing scale: differences by education, working year, and professional satisfaction

Author:

Sahin AyseORCID,Tarsuslu BediaORCID,Yilmaz AslıORCID,Kuni FilizORCID,Durat GulgunORCID

Abstract

Abstract Background Humanistic nursing practices scientifically improve the knowledge structure of nursing, enrich its theoretical system and support its development. Therefore, it is crucial to evaluate the humanistic practice abilities of nurses. Objective This study aimed to test the psycholinguistic features, language and construct validity of the Humanistic Practice Ability of Nursing Scale and to examine it according to nurses’ demographic characteristics. Design and methods This study was a methodological type of analytical research conducted with 397 clinical nurses working in a hospital. A questionnaire including demographic information and evaluating empathy and compassion adequacy was used. Data were analyzed using explanatory and confirmatory factor analysis, Cronbach’s alpha, item-total score correlation, split-half analysis, t-test, analysis of variance and correlation analysis. Results The scale consists of 29 items and four factors, explaining 61.15% of the total variance. Factor loads were > 0.30. confirmatory factor analysis results were χ2/df: 2.58, GFI: 0.86, TLI: 0.91, IFI: 0.92, CFI: 0.92, RMSEA: 0.06, and SRMR: 0.03. The Cronbach alpha value for the full scale is 0.95. A significant relationship was found between the scale and empathy and compassion proficiency. It was observed that the scale scores differed according to the nurses’ education level, working years and job satisfaction (p < 0.05). Conclusion This study shows that the Turkish version of the HPAN scale is valid and reliable for 29 items and four factors. The humanistic practice ability of nurses differ according to postgraduate education, years of working in the profession and professional satisfaction.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Reference30 articles.

1. Taghinezhad F, Mohammadi E, Khademi M, Kazemnejad A. Humanistic care in nursing: Concept analysis using rodgers’ evolutionary approach. Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res. 2022;27(2):83–91.

2. Subaşi T, Özbek Güven G. Professional values of nurses and affecting factors. USCEH Dergisi. 2022;2(2):20–7.

3. Altun İ. Etik Ve Değerler. In: Aştı A, Karadağ A, editors. Hemşirelik Esasları Hemşirelik Bilimi ve Sanatı Cilt 1. Akademi Basın Yayıncılık; 2014. p. 119.

4. Çoban N, Eryiğit T, Dülcek S, Derya Beydağ K, Ortabağ T. The place of artificial intelligence and robot technologies in the nursing profession. Fenerbahce Univ J Heal Sci. 2022;2(1):378–85.

5. Kleiman S. Josephine Paterson and Loeratt Zderad’s humanistic nursing theory. In: Parker ME, Smith MC, editors. Nursing theories nursing practice. 3rd ed. F.A. Davis Company; 2014. pp. 338–48.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3