Inhibitors and facilitators of compliance with professional ethics standards: nurses’ perspective

Author:

Sharifi Shahram,Ebrahimi Hossein,Elyaszadeh Shahla,Latifi Arman,Khodayari Mohammad Taghi,Alizadeh Maedeh

Abstract

Abstract Introduction The clinical practices of nurses should be in accordance with the principles of professional ethics. Respecting professional ethics principles depends on several factors. The present study was conducted to investigate the effective inhibitors and facilitators in compliance with professional ethics and their importance from the nurses’ perspective. Methods During this cross-sectional descriptive study, 452 nurses were included by the census sampling method. The data were collected via the “inhibitors of compliance with professional ethics standards by the nurses’ perspective” and “facilitators of compliance with professional ethics standards by the nurses’ perspective” questionnaires. Additionally, by designing the “open-ended question” section, other inhibiting and facilitating factors of professional ethics standards from the nurses’ perspective were investigated. The data were analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics (Wilcoxon signed ranks test). Results The individual care-related dimension as a facilitator had the highest mean score compared to the other dimensions (76.62 ± 4.92). Furthermore, seven items in the inhibitor section, 19 items in the facilitator section had higher scores. Among them, there were seven items in common. Strong or weak belief in compliance with ethical issues had the highest mean scores in the role of facilitator and inhibitor (90.54 ± 12.13 and 89.54 ± 14.88, respectively). Conclusion Strong or weak belief in compliance with ethical issues was the most important inhibitor and facilitator from the nurses’ perspective, which makes it necessary to examine individual beliefs about ethical issues among applicants to enter the nursing profession.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Reference24 articles.

1. Rizalar S, Baltacı N, Yildizeli̇ Topçu S, Sani̇Oğlu G. Ethical decision-making among Intensive Care Unit and operating room nurses ameliyathane ve Yoğun Bakım Hemşirelerinde Etik Karar Verme Düzeyi. Archives Health Sci Res. 2020;7(2).

2. nursing c. Virginia Henderson’s Need Theory. 03/12/2020 [cited 2023]. Available from: https://currentnursing.com/nursing_theory/Henderson.html.

3. Haahr A, Norlyk A, Martinsen B, Dreyer P. Nurses experiences of ethical dilemmas: a review. Nurs Ethics. 2020;27(1):258–72.

4. Kangasniemi M, Pakkanen P, Korhonen A. Professional ethics in nursing: an integrative review. J Adv Nurs. 2015;71(8):1744–57.

5. Borhani F, Alhani F, Mohammadi E, Abbaszade A. Development of nursing professional ethics competence, necessity and challenges in ethic education. Iran J Med Ethics. 2009;2(3):27–38.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3