Nursing faculty’s point of view regarding noncompliance with ethics in academic environments: a qualitative study

Author:

Taghadosi Mohsen,Valiee Sina,Aghajani MohammadORCID

Abstract

Abstract Background An academic environment is the first place that nursing students are introduced to ethics related to nursing and healthcare. In this study, we explored the nursing faculty members’ point of view regarding noncompliance with these academic ethics. Methods This study was a qualitative descriptive study conducted in 2018. Faculty members at a nursing school were selected through purposeful sampling. Data was collected using semi-structured interviews. The interviews were digitally recorded and transcribed verbatim. Data collection and data analysis were conducted simultaneously. Data saturation was ensured with 11 interviews. The interview transcripts were analyzed using a qualitative content analysis method introduced by Elo and Kyngäs. Results The participants were six women and five men with 12.72 ± 6.64 years of experience as nursing instructors. After data analysis, seven categories were identified: discrimination, violence, misuse, out-of-date instruction and knowledge, conflicts of evaluation, hypocrisy, and disorganization. Conclusion The findings of this study indicated the existence of noncompliance regarding academic ethics. It is recommended that faculty members be informed about possible instances of ethical noncompliance in academia. There is a need to develop strategies to promote a faculty’s compliance with academic ethics. Academic administrators need to emphasize the importance of ethics in academia and use further methods to enhance academic ethics.

Funder

None

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

General Nursing

Reference40 articles.

1. Sadati AK, Salehzade H, Joulaei H, Hemmati S. College’s Role in Ethical Promotion of Nursing. J Health Man Info. 2014;1(1):7–10.

2. Grace PJ. Nursing ethics and professional responsibility in advanced practice. 3 st ed. Burlington: Jones & Bartlett. Learning. 2017. p. 35-68.

3. Jafari H, Khaghanizade M, Nouri JM, Nir MS, Jafari H, Khaghanizade M, et al. Developmental Strategies for Nursing Ethics Education. Medical Ethics J. 2017;10(38):81–90.

4. Khaghanizade M, Malaki H, Abbasi M, Abbaspour A, Mohamadi E. Faculty-Related Challenges in Medical Ethics Education: A Qualitative Study. Iran J Med Edu. 2012;11(8):903–16.

5. Corlett JA. The Role of Philosophy in Academic Ethics. J Academic Ethics. 2014;12:1–14.

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3