Author:
Li Yuqing,Guo Lei-lei,Gui Jiaofeng,Zhang Xiaoyun,Wang Ying,Liu Haiyang,Li Jinlong,Lei Yunxiao,Li Xiaoping,Sun Lu,Yang Liu,Yuan Ting,Wang Congzhi,Zhang Dongmei,Wei Huanhuan,Li Jing,Liu Mingming,Hua Ying,Zhang Lin
Abstract
Abstract
Objective
To translate the Academic Goals Orientation Questionnaire (AGOQ) into Chinese and to determine the validity and reliability of the (AGOQ) in Chinese nursing students based on SEM and IRT multidimensional models.
Methods
The participants were 654 nursing students with an age range of 17–26 years (mean age 21.61 ± 1.73 years). The psychometric properties of AGOQ were investigated based on a dual analytical perspective of structural equation modeling (SEM) and item response theory (IRT).
Results
The Cronbach’s α value of the questionnaire is 0.895. A four-factor model was obtained by exploratory factor analysis, which explained the variance of 71.892%. With confirmatory factor analysis, a new four-factors model was built and showed an acceptable goodness-of-fit, chi-square/degree of freedom (CMIN/DF) = 4.008, goodness of fit index (GFI) = 0.932, adjusted goodness of fit index (AGFI) = 0.905, comparative fit index (CFI) = 0.952, incremental fit index (IFI) = 0.952, Tucker Lewis index (TLI) = 0.941. In the analysis part of IRT, according to the comparison between Akek’s information criterion (AIC) and Bayesian information criterion (BIC), we choose the Graded Response Model (GRM) for analysis. The results show that the difficulty value is monotonically increasing, and the discrimination of all items is greater than 0.19, which shows that 16 items can be retained.
Conclusions
This study tested the psychometric characteristics of AGOQ of nursing students in China. The results confirmed that the Chinese version of AGOQ has good psychometric characteristics and can be used to measure the academic goal orientation of nursing students in China.
Funder
Internal Medicine Nursing Teaching Team
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference53 articles.
1. Jianqing L, Wenbo X, Jingjing L. Content analysis of national standards for undergraduate professional teaching quality in colleges and universities. J High Continuing Educ. 2018;31(5):7.
2. Sparfeldt JR, Brunnemann N, Wirthwein L, Buch SR, Schult J, Rost DH. General versus specific achievement goals: a re-examination. Learn Individual Differences. 2015;43:170–7.
3. Lazcano LM, González-Chordá VM, Manrique-Abril FG, Cervera-Gasch Á, Mena-Tudela D, Andreu-Pejó L. Valero-Chillerón MJ. Characteristics and determinants of the academic goals in nursing education: a cross-sectional study. Nurse Educ Today. 2022;114:105402.
4. Skaalvik EM. Self-enhancing and self-defeating ego orientation: relations with task and avoidance orientation, achievement, self-perceptions, and anxiety. J Educ Psychol. 1997;89(1):71–81.
5. León-Del-Barco B, Mendo-Lázaro S, Iglesias Gallego S, Polo-Del-Río MI, Iglesias Gallego D. Academic goals and parental control in primary school children. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2019;17(1).