Author:
Pouwels Climmy,Spauwen Peggy,Verbeek Hilde,Winkens Ieke,Ponds Rudolf
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Introducing new working methods is common in healthcare organisations. However, implementation of a new method is often suboptimal. This reduces the effectiveness of the innovation and has several other negative effects, for example on staff turnover. The aim of the current study was to implement the ABC method in residential departments for brain injured patients and to assess the quality of the implementation process. The ABC method is a simplified form of behavioural modification based on the concept that behaviour operates on the environment and is maintained by its consequences.
Methods
Four residential departments for brain injured patients introduced the ABC method sequentially as healthcare innovation using a stepped-wedge design. A systematic process evaluation of the implementation was carried out using the framework of Saunders et al. Descriptive statistics were used to analyse the quantitative data; open questions were clustered.
Results
The training of the ABC method was well executed and the nursing staff was enthusiastic and sufficiently involved. Important aspects for successful implementation had been addressed (like a detailed implementation plan and implementation meetings). However, facilitators and barriers that were noted were not addressed in a timely manner. This negatively influenced the extent to which the ABC method could be properly learned, implemented, and applied in the short and long term.
Conclusions
The most challenging part of the introduction of this new trained and introduced method in health care was clearly the implementation. To have a successful implementation serious attention is needed to tailor-made evidence-based implementation strategies based on facilitators and barriers that are identified during the implementation process. Bottlenecks in working with the ABC method have to be addressed as soon as possible. This likely requires ‘champions’ who are trained for the job, next to an organisation’s management that facilitates the multidisciplinary teams and provides clarity about policy and agreements regarding the training and implementation of the new method. The current process evaluation and the recommendations may serve as an example for the implementation of new methods in other healthcare organisations.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference36 articles.
1. Pouwels CGJG, Wolters-Grégorio G, Spauwen PJJ, Bus BAA, Winkens I, Ponds RWHM. Prevalentie en uitingsvormen van agressie bij volwassen patiënten met niet-aangeboren hersenletsel: een literatuuroverzicht. Tijdschr Psychiatr. 2019;61(12):862–78.
2. Stéfan A, Mathé JF, SOFMER Group. What are the disruptive symptoms of behavioural disorders after traumatic brain injury? A systematic review leading to recommendations for good practices. Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2016;59(1):5–17. Epub 2016 Jan 4.
3. Alderman N. Prevalence, characteristics and causes of aggressive behaviour observed within a neurobehavioural rehabilitation service: predictors and implications for management. Brain Inj. 2007;21:891–911. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699050701543560
4. Azouvi P, Jokic C, Attal N, Denys P, Markabi S, Bussel B. Carbamazepine in agitation and aggressive behaviour following severe closed-head injury: results of an open trial. Brain Inj. 1999;13(10):797–804. https://doi.org/10.1080/026990599121188
5. Lanctôt N, Guay S. The aftermath of workplace violence among healthcare workers: a systematic literature review of the consequences. Aggress Violent Behav. 2014;19:492–501. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2014.07.010