Author:
Pusa Susanna,Lind Susanne,Häggström Marie
Abstract
Abstract
Background
International and national guidelines state that palliative care should be offered to everyone who needs it. To promote the implementation of palliative care in nursing homes, a partnership collaboration was initiated with the goal of implementing high quality palliative care. The partnership consisted of three partner groups: a project group from a non-profit organisation providing health care, managers at the nursing homes and an academic partner. The aim was to explore the social processes within academic-community partnership in a collaboration project.
Methods
Digital focus group discussions were conducted with 16 participants, representing all three partner groups. One individual digital interview was also carried out. A constructivist perspective of a grounded theory approach was used for data analysis.
Results
The core category, partnership positioning, covers the social processes of the academic-community partnership in a collaboration project to implement and evaluate health-promoting interventions in clinical health care. The core category was found to have four categories: Pre-positioning, Co-positioning, Re-positioning and GoOn-positioning. The process of partnership positioning is conceptualised in a model.
Conclusions
Our findings indicate that a new partnership in an implementation project needs holistic, systemic thinking. To enhance implementation in a collaborative project involving different professionals and actors a plan is required to facilitate positioning activities. The process, the roles and the components need to be clearly defined and documented, and the management of a system requires knowledge of the interrelationships between all the components within the system. The development of a conceptual model of Partnership Positioning contributes to knowledge concerning the social dynamic processes which can be applied to support future academic-community collaboration and/or implementation projects.
Trial registration
Not applicable. The present study has not been considered as a clinical trial.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference39 articles.
1. Batalden PB, Davidoff F. What is “quality improvement” and how can it transform healthcare. Qual Saf Health Care. 2007;16(1):2–3. https://doi.org/10.1136/qshc.2006.022046.
2. Sepúlveda C, Marlin A, Yoshida T, Ullrich A. Palliative care: the World Health Organization’s global perspective. J Pain Symptom Manag. 2002;24(2):91–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0885-3924(02)00440-2.
3. Radbruch L, De Lima L, Knaul F, Wenk R, Ali Z, Bhatnaghar S, et al. Redefining palliative care-a new consensus-based definition. J Pain Symptom Manag. 2020;60(4):754–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2020.04.027.
4. National Board of Health and Welfare. A national knowledge-based guidance for End-of-life palliative care. (Nationellt kunskapsstöd för god palliativ vård i livets slutskede : vägledning, rekommendationer och indikatorer : stöd för styrning och ledning). (9789175550725). National Board of Health and Welfare (Socialstyrelsen); 2013.
5. International Council of Nurses. Nursing definitions. https://www.icn.ch/nursing-policy/nursing-definitions. Accessed 1 July 2021.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献