Author:
Rahuel Céline,Pautrat Maxime,Aïdoud Amal,Fougère Bertrand,Debacq Camille
Abstract
Abstract
Introduction
It is well known that polypharmacy is associated with adverse drug events. Accordingly, specialist geriatric units have to pay particular attention to the appropriateness of prescription and the withdrawal of potentially inappropriate medications. Even though community healthcare professionals are keen to received medication reconciliation results, the literature data show that the quality of communication between the hospital and the community needs to be improved.
Objective
To assess community healthcare professionals’ opinions about the receipt of medication reconciliation results when a patient is discharged from a specialist geriatric unit.
Method
We performed a qualitative study of general practitioners, community pharmacists and retirement home physicians recruited by phone in the Indre-et-Loire region of France. A grounded theory method was used to analyze interviews in multidisciplinary focus groups.
Results
The 17 community healthcare professionals first explained why the receipt of medication reconciliation results was important to them: clarifying the course and outcomes of hospital stays and reducing the lack of dialogue with the hospital, so that the interviewees could provide the care expected of them. The interviewees also described mistrust of the hospital and uncertainty when the modifications were received; these two concepts accentuated each other over time. Lastly, they shared their opinions about the information provided by the hospital, which could improve patient safety and provide leverage for treatment changes but also constituted a burden.
Perspectives
Our participants provided novel feedback and insight, constituting the groundwork for an improved medication reconciliation form that could be evaluated in future research. Exploring hospital-based professionals’ points of view might help to determine whether the requested changes in the medication reconciliation form are feasible and might provide a better understanding of community-to-hospital communication.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference30 articles.
1. Midão L, Giardini A, Menditto E, Kardas P, Costa E. Polypharmacy prevalence among older adults based on the Survey of Health, Aging and Retirement in Europe. Arch Gerontol Geria. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archger.2018.06.018.
2. Péhourcq F, Molimard M. Pharmacocinétique chez le sujet âgé. Rev Mal Respir. 2004;21(5):25–32.
3. Chang TI, et al. Polypharmacy, hospitalization, and mortality risk: a nationwide cohort study. Sci Rep. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-75888-8.
4. AFSSAPS. Prévenir la iatrogénèse médicamenteuse chez le sujet âgé. 2005. https://archiveansm.integra.fr/var/ansm_site/storage/original/application/9641eb3f4a1e67ba18a6b8aecd3f1985.pdf. Accessed Jun 2023.
5. Queneau P, Adnet F, Bannwarth B, Carpentier F, Bouget J, Trinh-Duc A. Iatrogénie comme motif de recours aux urgences. 2007. https://www.sfmu.org/upload/70_formation/02_eformation/02_congres/Urgences/urgences2007/donnees/pdf/47_queneau.pdf. Accessed Dec 2023.