Abstract
Abstract
Background
With rising numbers of elderly people living in nursing homes in Germany, the need for on-site primary care is increasing. A lack of primary care in nursing homes can lead to unnecessary hospitalization, higher mortality, and morbidity in the elderly. The project CoCare (“coordinated medical care”) has therefore implemented a complex health intervention in nursing homes, using inter alia, regular medical rounds, a shared patient medical record and medication checks, with the aim of improving the coordination of medical care. This study reports upon the results of a qualitative study assessing the perceived barriers and facilitators of the implementation of CoCare by stakeholders.
Methods
Focus group interviews were held between October 2018 and November 2019 with nurses, general practitioners and GP’s assistants working or consulting in a participating nursing home. A semi-structured modular guideline was used to ask participants for their opinion on different aspects of CoCare and which barriers and facilitators they perceived. Focus groups were analyzed using qualitative content analysis.
Results
In total, N = 11 focus group interviews with N = 74 participants were conducted. We found six themes describing barriers and facilitators in respect of the implementation of CoCare: understaffing, bureaucracy, complexity, structural barriers, financial compensation, communication and collaboration. Furthermore, participants described the incorporation of the intervention into standard care.
Conclusion
Barriers perceived by stakeholders are well known in the literature (e.g. understaffing and complexity). However, CoCare provides a good structure to overcome barriers and some barriers will dissolve after implementation into routine care (e.g. bureaucracy). In contrast, especially communication and collaboration were perceived as facilitators in CoCare, with the project being received as a team building intervention itself.
Trial registration
WHO UTN: U1111–1196-6611; DRKS-ID: DRKS00012703 (Date of Registration in DRKS: 2017 Aug 23).
Funder
Innovation Committee at the Federal Joint Committee
Universitätsklinikum Freiburg
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Geriatrics and Gerontology
Reference36 articles.
1. Statistisches Bundesamt (Destatis). Bevölkerung im Wandel - Annahmen und Ergebnisse der 14. koordinierten Bevölkerungsvorausberechnung. Wiesbaden: Statistisches Bundesamt; 2019.
2. Isfort M, Rottländer R, Weidner F, Gehlen D, Hylla J, Tucman D. In: DIfaP eV, editor. Pflege-Thermometer 2018. Eine bundesweite Befragung von Leistungskräften zur Situation der Pflege und Patientenversorgung in der stationären Langzeitplfege in Deutschland. Köln: Deutsches Insitut für angewandte Pflegeforschung e.V; 2018.
3. Glynn LG, Valderas JM, Healy P, Burke E, Newell J, Gillespie P, et al. The prevalence of multimorbidity in primary care and its effect on health care utilization and cost. Fam Pract. 2011;28(5):516–23.
4. van den Bussche H, Schön G, Kolonko T, Hansen H, Wegscheider K, Glaeske G, et al. Patterns of ambulatory medical care utilization in elderly patients with special reference to chronic diseases and multimorbidity -results from a claims data based observational study in Germany. BMC Geriatr. 2011;11:54.
5. Schulz M, Czwikla J, Tsiasioti C, Schwinger A, Gand D, Schmiemann G, et al. Differences in medical specialist utilization among older people in need of long-term care - results from German health claims data. Int J Equity Health. 2020;19:22.
Cited by
11 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献