Assessing equity and quality indicators for older people – Adaptation and validation of the Assessing Care of Vulnerable Elders (ACOVE) checklist for the Portuguese care context
-
Published:2022-07-06
Issue:1
Volume:22
Page:
-
ISSN:1471-2318
-
Container-title:BMC Geriatrics
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:BMC Geriatr
Author:
Taveira Adriana,Macedo Ana Paula,Rego Nazaré,Crispim José
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Development has promoted longer and healthier lives, but the rise in the proportion of older adults poses new challenges to health systems. Susceptibilities of older persons resulting from lower knowledge about services availability, health illiteracy, lower income, higher mental decline, or physical limitations need to be identified and monitored to assure the equity and quality of health care. The aim of this study was to develop equity indicators for the Assessing Care of Vulnerable Elders (ACOVE)-3 checklist and perform the first cross-cultural adaptation and validation of this checklist into Portuguese.
Methods
A scoping literature review of determinants or indicators of health (in)equity in the care of older people was performed. A total of 5 language experts and 18 health professionals were involved in the development and validation of the equity and quality indicators through expert opinion and focus groups. Data collected from focus groups was analyzed through directed or conventional content analysis. The usefulness of the indicators was assessed by analyzing the clinical records of 30 patients.
Results
The literature review revealed that there was a worldwide gap concerning equity indicators for older people primary health care. A structured and complete checklist composed of equity and quality indicators was obtained, validated and assessed. A significant number of non-screened quality or equity related potential occurrences that could have been avoided if the proposed indicators were implemented were detected. The percentage of non-registered indicators was 76.6% for quality and 96.7% for equity.
Conclusions
Applying the proposed checklist will contribute to improve the monitoring of the clinical situation of vulnerable older people and the planning of medical and social actions directed at this group.
Funder
Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Geriatrics and Gerontology
Reference73 articles.
1. Wilkinson RD, Pickett K. The spirit level: Why more equal societies almost always do better. New York, NY, US: Bloomsbury Publishing; 2009. p. xvii-331– xvii.
2. Lee JH, Sadana R. The Comission on Social Determinants of Health Knowledge Networks. Improving equity in health by addressing social determinants. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2011.
3. Institute of Medicine Committee on Quality of Health Care in A. Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US). Copyright 2001 by the National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.; 2001.
4. Whitehead M. The concepts and principles of equity and health. Int J Health Serv. 1992;22(3):429–45.
5. Braveman P. Health disparities and health equity: concepts and measurement. Annu Rev Public Health. 2006;27:167–94.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献